Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />cricical ?eriod of record. The formula, considering total ~ater su~~ly, <br />available reservoir storage, and total deMands, i. shown below: <br /> <br />Allowable .ARn,l Upper S&lin Depletion . (Useable Reservoir Storage ~ number of <br />years in critical period) . average <br />annual streamflow at Lees Ferry 1/ for <br />critical period - annual delivery co <br />Lower Sasin . annual shortage <br /> <br />Calculation of the 5.8 MAl Up~er S..in de~leti~n limit is ex~lained a. follows: <br /> <br />auervoirs <br />Lake Powll <br />Fllll1na Gorce <br />Navajo <br />Blue He.. <br />Monow Point <br />Cr,.tal <br /> <br />Storage <br />27,000 <br />3,789 <br />1,709 <br />941 <br />117 <br />2S <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />(l.OOO's of acre-feet) <br />Minimum Pover Pool <br />6,124 - <br />273 <br />673 <br />192 <br />75 <br />12 <br /> <br />Available <br />20,876 <br />3,516 <br />1,036 <br />749 <br />42 <br />13 <br />26,232 <br /> <br />The bottom line figure, 26.232 MAl, is added to che total virlin flow duriac the <br />mo.t critical 34-year period (1931-1964) at 439.417 MAP. Thi. equals 465.649 MAl. <br />In es.ence, this mesns chat che storage project adds water durina the .oet cr1t~ <br />ical period flow. Therefore, the most cricical period flow witb the storage <br />project is 465.649 MAl. divided by 34 years. which equals 13.695 KAY; this tlow, <br />les. Colorado River Com~act and Mexiean Treaty deliveries. equals 5.446 MAl. <br />This final numbet re~resents U~~er Basin ae~letions assuming no shortages. If <br />an average shortage of 6.11 percent is assumed (2.1 MAP of M&I uses with no <br />shortage and 3.7 MAP of irrigation with an aver~ge shortage of 10 percent). we <br />divide 5.446 MAP by 93.89 percent which gives the 5.8 MAl a~~er Basin pos.ible <br />depletion. <br /> <br />The effect of sediment accumulation in Lake Powell ~as also evaluated. <br />Preliminary planning .tudie. indicate that the total IOO-year volume of accumu- <br />lated sediment in Lake Povell would be 8.54 MAl. 3.9 MAl of which would be <br />expected to deposit above the minimum power pool. Consideration at chis volume <br />of sediment in the above equation changes the com~uced depletion by only <br />2 percent. <br /> <br />.'~ere are two different hydrology data sets available that were used with the <br />formula to ..algate and verify the present 5.8 MAP decerminacion. The hydrology <br />data seU qe used with the fomula to determine average streamflow and the <br />critieal period. These are discussed below: <br /> <br />I. Virgin Flows - Virgin flows are com~uted. undepleted flows at Lee Ferry. <br />They are available on an annual basis for the period 1896 to 1981. <br /> <br />1/ For hydrologic data interpretation purposes, Lees Ferry is a point on the <br />Colorado River just above the Paria River, where a river flow gauge 1s located. <br />Lee Ferry represents a eompact point between the Upper and Lover Colorado River <br />Basins. No flow gauge is located at Lee Ferry; Upper Colorado River flows are <br />computed from the Lees Ferry gauge and a flow gauge at the mouth of the Paria <br />River. <br />