Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />III. aydrolog1~ Investigation <br /> <br />!he Depart..nt of Interior's present po.ition on water availability in the Upper <br />Basin is that for planning purposes, it will be assumed that up to 5.8 MAl of <br />water can be 'afely depleted annually in the Upper Sasin. !his Qumber was <br />derived froa three a.sumptions: (1) the lowest 3~-year period of natural <br />runoff; (2) tolerable shortages to irrigated agriculture; and (3) delivery of <br />half the Mexican Treaty ~omm1tment from the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />As to water use in the Upper Ba.in, sub. action (b) of Article III of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin Compact permits New Mexico or any other Upper Ba.in State <br />to use waters in exce.. of it. percentage allotment, provided such excess use <br />doe. not prohibit any of the reMaining State. from ut~lizing its re.pective <br />allotment. Thu., the availability of Navajo Reservoir watar for .unicipal and <br />indu.trial purpo.e. in New Mexico beyond the year 2005 depend. upon the extent <br />of water use in .the entire Upper Basin beyond year 2005 a. well a. upon the <br />phy.ical availability of water in Navajo a..ervoir. <br /> <br />To avoid a critical compact interpretation, we a.sume that the Opper Ba.in will <br />be obligated to deliver 75 MAl of water every 10 years at Lee Ferry, plus <br />750,000 acre-feet annually toward Mexican Treaty deliverie.. This would require <br />an average annual water delivery ~t Lee Ferry of 8.25 ~~. Thi. a..umption i. <br />not to be eonaidered a. an interpretation of the Upper Basin obligatioG for <br />water delivery at Lee Ferry under the Colorado River Coapact. It repre.ent., <br />rather, a practical and conservative approach for the purpo.e. of the pre.ent <br />determination required by sectioG 11(a) of Public Law 87-483. <br /> <br />!hroughout the hydrologi~ investigation, and as ~emonstrated in the'attached <br />tables, present Colorado River Storage Project (CaSP) operating policy, alona <br />with required Upper Sasin water deliverie., eombine ~o form the underlying <br />aseumption. that are integral to a hydrologic determiLation of water. avail- <br />ab~lity from Navajo Reservoir and the Upper Colorado River Ba.in for use in <br />New Mexico. <br /> <br />An estimate of projected water depletions for Bureau of Reclamation projects, <br />together with non-Federal projects, inditates that total depletions in the Upper <br />Basin will Qot reach 5.8 MAl until some time after year 2030 and very likely not <br />until year 2040. !he table of "Projected Water Supply and Depletion., Upper <br />Colorado River Basin" dated September 1984, which is appended to this report, <br />shows the projected timing for development of the water apportioned to each of <br />the Upper Ba.in State. Within this 5.8 MAl limit: Arizona, 50,000 acre-feet; <br />~ <br />Colorado, 2,976,000 acre-feet; New Mexico, 647,000 acre-feet; Utah, <br />1,322,000 acre-feet; Wyoming, 805,000 acre-feet. !he Upper Basin States have <br />reviewed tbi. table and, although they do not ne~essarily agree, they have <br />eho.en noc to object. !he State of Wyoming has said that it reserves the right <br />to submit a formal obje~tion. <br /> <br />A. Study Ap~roa~h <br /> <br />The present operation of the reservoirs 0: the ColoradO River Sy.tem in <br />ac~ordance with Publi~ Law 90-537 Operating Criteria is based on a Simple for- <br />mula approach that indicates water available for upper Basin ~onsumpt1ve use <br />would be limited to an average of 5.8 HAl annually if delivery to the Lower <br />Basin 0: 8.25 HAl is maintained during low flow periods similar to the most <br />