Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1--0. <br />CJ1 <br />C> <br />c.u <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />TABLES--Continued <br /> <br />8. Present sediment load at gaging stations in the Green River in <br /> <br />Wyoming study reach and projected increments of sediment <br /> <br />loading associated with medium energy-resource development <br /> <br />without EET in the year 2000--------------------------------- <br /> <br />9. Present sediment load at gaging stations in the Yampa River <br /> <br />study reach .and projected increments of sediment loading <br /> <br />associated with medium energy-resource development without <br /> <br />EET in the year 2000---------------~------------------------- <br /> <br />lOA. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br />Upper White River in the year 2000 assuming no salt return--- <br /> <br />lOB. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br />Upper White River in the year 2000 assuming salt return------ <br /> <br />llA. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br />Lower White River in the year 2000 assuming no salt return--- <br /> <br />lIB. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br />Lower White River in the year 2000 assuming salt return------ <br /> <br />12A. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River in the year 2000 assuming no salt <br /> <br />return------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />d),Q <br /> <br />:2/ <br /> <br />;19 <br /> <br />;19 <br /> <br />.30 <br /> <br />3/ <br /> <br />~ ~ <br />..._~.~ <br /> <br />. ~ <br /> <br />12B. Projected water-discharge and dissolved-solids budget for the <br /> <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River in the y.v 2000 assuming salt return---- ~U <br />