Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~..........,....... Animas-La Plata <br />., Project <br /> <br />... ............................. .......................... <br /> <br />Project Background <br /> <br />The Animas-La Plata Project (ALP), located in southwestern <br />Colorado and northwestern New Mexico, has been the <br />subject of substantial public interest and environmental review <br />since it was authorized. The following is a short history of <br />some of the project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1968 - Congress authorized construction of the <br />Animas-La Plata Project as a multi-purpose project <br />providing a water supply averaging nearly 191,200 <br />acre-feet for irrigation and municipal and industrial use <br />in Colorado and New Mexico. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1980 - The Bureau of Reclamation released a Final <br />Environmental Statement on the mu~i-purpose <br />project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1980-81- Construction of the project was scheduled <br />to begin, but President Carter called for no new water <br />projects. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1988 - Congress passed the Colorado Ute Indian <br />Water Rights Settlement Act to resolve the senior <br />water rights claims of the Southern Ute and Ute <br />Mountain Ute Indian Tribes whose reservations were <br />established in southwest Colorado in the 19" century. <br />The Settlement Act allowed future development of the <br />region and protected existing water uses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1990 - Based on new biological information, the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service issued a draft biological <br />opinion concluding that the project would jeopardize <br />the continued existence of the Colorado pikeminnow. <br />No reasonable and prudent a~ernatives were <br />identified at this time. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1991 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a Final <br />Biological Opinion that contained a reasonable and <br />prudent a~ernative that limited the project depletions <br />to 57,100 acre-feet per year while an endangered fish <br />recovery program was conducted. This opinion <br />allowed construction of the project to begin. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1992 - A lawsuit filed by environmental organizations <br />ha~ed construction of the project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1996 - Reclamation released a Final Supplement to <br />the Final Environmental Statement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1996-97 - Colorado Governor Romer and Lt. <br />Governor Schoettler convened both supporters and <br />opponents of the project to address unresolved <br />issues associated with the original ALP and to gain <br />consensus on an a~ernative to the project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This process resu~ed in the suggestion of two <br />a~ernatives, a structural and a non-structural <br />proposal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1998 - The Department of the Interior recommended <br />construction of a substantially scaled-down project <br />that was designed to satisfy the Colorado Ute Tribes' <br />water rights claims and provide for identified municipal <br />and industrial needs in the project area. The proposal <br />down-sized the project to comply with Endangered <br />Species Act and Clean Water Act requirements. It <br />excluded non-Indian irrigation systems because of <br />water quality concerns. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2000 - Reclamation released a Final Supplemental <br />Environmental Impact Statement and Record of <br />Decision that identified the selected a~ernative as a <br />down-sized project that focuses on providing the <br />Colorado Ute Tribes an assured water supply. The <br />selected a~ernative contained both structural and <br />nonstructural components. Because this alternative <br />would provide benefits to the Colorado Ute Tribes <br />which are not identical to those envisioned in the 1988 <br />Settlement, it was recognized that Congressional <br />authorization was needed to achieve final <br />implementation of the 1988 Settlement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2000 - Congress authorized the scaled-down project <br />with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act Amendments of <br />2000. These Amendments authorized construction of <br />a reservoir, pumping plant and inlet conduit with an <br />average annual depletion of 57,1 00 acre-feet (an acre- <br />foot is the amount of water it takes to cover an acre 1 <br />foot deep). The Amendments also establish a <br />Colorado Ute Settlement Fund and appropriations to <br />occur over a 5-year period to allow construction of the <br />project features within 7 years. In addition, the ' <br />Amendments established a $40 million Resource Fund <br />for the Ute Mountain Ute and Southern ute Indian <br />Tribes for municipal or rural water development, and <br />resource acquisition and enhancement. <br /> <br />Project Plan <br /> <br />The project consists of both structural and nonstructural <br />components. The structural components consist of: <br /> <br />. An off-stream reservoir at Ridges Basin, southwest of <br />Durango, Colorado, to store about 120,000 acre-feet <br />(total capacity) of water pumped from the Animas <br />River. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A 280 cubic feet per second capacity pumping plant <br />located south of the center of Durango on the west <br />side of the Animas River across from the downstream <br />end of Durango's Santa Rita Park. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A buried pipeline that will carry project water from the <br />pumping plant to Ridges Basin Reservoir. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A buried pipeline to carry water from the Farmington, <br />New Mexico area to the Shiprock, New Mexico area <br />