Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Poin t of <br />Reference <br />of River Reach <br /> <br />FlOliS at 1949 <br />Level of <br />Development <br />1898-1972 <br /> <br />Depletions Bet\;een <br />1949 and 1970 <br /> <br />Flo\;s at 1970 <br />Level of Pevelpmt II <br />1898-1972 I <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Incremental Cumlatv. <br /> <br />~Iissouri River at Big Bend Dam <br />Between Big Bend & Ft Randall <br />~ussouri R at Ft Randall Dam 21,640,000 <br />Bet'.'een Ft Randall & Gavins Pt <br />Missouri R at Gavins Pt Dam 23,059,000 <br />Betl<een Gavins Pt & Sioux City <br />~fissouri R. at Sioux City, Ia 24,593,000 <br />Between Sioux City & Mouth <br />Missouri River at ~louth 58,118,000 <br /> <br /> 2,362,000 <br />160,000 <br /> 2,522,000 <br />143,000 <br /> 2,665,000 <br />107,000 <br /> 2,772,000 <br />2,096,000 <br /> 4,868,000 <br /> <br />19,118,000 <br /> <br />20,394,000 <br /> <br />21,821,000 <br /> <br />53,250,000 <br /> <br />Streamflow depletion estimates have been made and subsequently revised on a <br />number of occasions since the Pick-Sloan plan Has first authorized. T\;o of <br />the most comprehensive estimates are those presented in the 1951 ~lBI^C report <br />on Adequacy of Flo\;s and in the 1969 FramCliork Study. These two depletion <br />estir.\ates arc shOlm on Exhibit 3 for comparison "i th current estimates \;hich <br />Here prepared in connection \;ith the Northern Great Plains Resource Program. <br />In general the current estim~tes are in the range of magnitude of earlier <br />estimates. <br /> <br />Although actual depletions have been some\;hat slO\ier than previous projections, <br />as demonstrated for the 1949 to 1970 period on E~\bit 3. Curves A, B, and C <br />on this exhibit represent future depletions under the fo1101dng possible <br />conditions of upstream \;ater use: <br /> <br />A. Depletions \;ith full USBR irrigation development and 3.0 million <br />acre-feet for coal development (reasonable maximwn depletions). <br /> <br />B. Depletions with partial USBR irrigation development 1.4 million <br />acre-feet for coal development (most likely depletions). <br /> <br />C. Depletions liith partial USBR irrigation development and 0.7 million <br />acre-feet for coal development (reasonable minimum depletions). <br /> <br />The depletion estimates for coal development recognize the interest which has <br />been expressed by numerous ellergy companies. Since 1967, options on storage <br />water,have been t~ken by ~OTe than a dozen companies totalin~ 712,000 ac:e-feet <br />from Boysen Reservoir, Lake Bighorn (Ye llolitail) and Tong~e. R7 vel' Res~rVolT.. <br />The follo'.;ing Table shows current interest in water acqu1s1t10n for 1ndustr1al <br />uses. Quantities are in acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />_..1 <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />I <br />