Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CD <br />,:--.J <br />M <br />N <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />PLAN FORMULATION <br /> <br />by an inlet structure would be conveyed to the reservoir by the Morapos <br />Feeder Canal as shown on the following map. Releases from the reservoir <br />into Milk Creek would be rediverted by the Milk Creek Diversion Dam about <br />4.5 miles downstream and carried to the irrigable lands by the Milk Creek <br />Canal and lIes Lateral. Water for future coal uses such as coal gasifi- <br />cation and powerplant cooling could be supplied directly from the reser- <br />voir or at any point downstream where it may be needed. <br /> <br />Water for the White River Segment would be diverted from the North <br />Fork at a point just upstream from its confluence with the South Fork. <br />Water diverted from North Fork would be pumped by the White River Feeder <br />Pump through the first 1,000 feet of the White River Feeder Conduit to <br />a point where it would flow by gravity. The end of the conduit would <br />branch to form the Yellow Jacket Conduit and the Oak Ridge Canal. This <br />relationship is indicated more clearly on the map. The Yellow Jacket <br />Conduit would carry the water supply for year-round coal industry and <br />municipal use and for surface irrigation in the summer. The Curtis Creek <br />Canal for irrigation would be an extension of the Yellow Jacket Conduit. <br />The Oak Ridge Canal would carry water for surface irrigation southeast <br />of Little Beaver Creek. Excess flows in the White River Feeder Conduit <br />would be released into the enlarged Lake Avery for storage and pumped <br />back into the conduit by the Avery Pumping Plant for project uses as <br />needed. <br /> <br />As there would be no project diversion or storage releases for,oil <br />shale processing, minimum streamflows in the lower mains tern would not <br />be provided. Provisions for recreation and fish and wildlife are des- <br />cribed at the end of the next section. <br /> <br />Project features <br /> <br />The project features described below are summarized in Chapter V <br />with those for each of the other plans. <br /> <br />Thornburgh Reservoir <br /> <br />Thornburgh Reservoir on Milk Creek would have a capacity of 36,000 <br />acre-feet and a surface area of 840 acres at normal water surface eleva- <br />tion, 6,716 feet. About 30,000 acre-feet of the capacity would be <br />active and 6,000 acre-feet dead and inactive. <br /> <br />Thornburgh Dam would be a rolled earthfill structure rising 129 feet <br />above the streambed and 755 feet long at the crest. The spillway would <br />have a capacity of 3,100 second-feet at maximum water surface elevation, <br />6,724 feet. The outlet works would be capable of releasing 160 second- <br />feet with the reservoir water surface at elevation 6,675 feet. <br /> <br />36 <br />