Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"" <br />if') <br />,.., <br />C\! <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />PLAN FORMULATION <br /> <br />Three proposals have been made to enhance the basic concept of this <br />plan environmentally. A big game management area would be established <br />on Oak Ridge by the purchase of private land to be consolidated with <br />public domain lands. Livestock grazing in this area would be curtailed <br />or eliminated and an intensive range management program would be in- <br />stituted by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The size of the area has <br />been estimated at from 3,000 to 5,000 acres and the cost estimated at 1 <br />to 2 million dollars. <br /> <br />Access easements for fishing would be acquired along the North and <br />South Forks of White River as well as the upper mainstem. These ease- <br />ments would be compatible with a scenic or recreation river designation <br />and could open an additional 20 miles of river to public fishing. <br /> <br />Facilities for historic preservation would be constructed at the <br />Thornburgh battle site. This would involve a small structure, housing <br />educational displays and possibly featuring some mementos and artifacts. <br /> <br />From an environmental standpoint, this alternative would help main- <br />tain and even improve the fish and wildlife and other natural resource <br />values of the Upper White River Valley with a program of positive action. <br />It might allow coal and oil shale development, with their associated <br />benefits and impacts, as the water resources might be developed by other <br />entities to support these industries. <br /> <br />Lake Avery would remain in its present state, a nonfluctuating <br />fishing and recreation reservoir. Additional lands in Big Beaver Valley <br />would not be inundated and landscape scars would not result in the North <br />Fork, Big Beaver, and Little Beaver Valleys. <br /> <br />Without the construction of Thornburgh Reservoir, coal interests on <br />the north side of the Danforth Hills would have to look for another source <br />of water. One alternative might be the acquisition of agricultural water <br />rights with privately-constructed terminal storage. This, of course, <br />would reduce the amount of irrigated crops produced in the Milk Creek <br />area. <br /> <br />On the south side of the Danforth Hills, the coal companies might <br />also purchase some agricultural water rights for part of their needs. <br />The anticipated needs for the coal industry in this area, however, are <br />greater than the amount of water available from irrigation supplies. <br />It has been suggested that a series of pumping plants could be con- <br />structed on the White River by the coal industry to pump water to a <br />terminal storage reservoir at the Coal Creek site. It has also been <br />suggested that farmers along the discharge line might be able to purchase <br />water for irrigation. The pumping plants would have to be sized to take <br />advantage of peak streamflow periods, and storage facilities would have <br />to be adequate to maintain a supply through low flow periods. <br /> <br />63 <br />