Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-' <br /> <br />"0 <br />I.f) <br />(.\] <br />.-.t <br />(u'" <br />Co') <br /> <br />". eJ <br /> <br />10- The DaHy Pre..- Wedne.day, hbruary t, 1883 <br /> <br />Unique aquatrain concept ~xplained <br /> <br />By PERRIIt Melin-LEN <br />Staff writer <br /> <br />It would SDake throup 1,300 mUes of <br />western territory carrylBl an annual 30 <br />million tons of cnnbed coal In liquid <br />carbon dioxide, and If everything goes <br />well it could save area eoal companies <br />more than SO percent In transportation <br />costs, as well as disposing of unwanted <br />saline water from the Colorado River <br />drainage system. <br />It's the Aquatrain. <br />Still only a concept, the aqua train <br />idea is growing dynamically as <br />representatives of Aquatrain Inc. <br />receive public input at many levels and <br />feed the information into the overall <br />plan for the system. <br />An example of this information- <br />gathering process is Aquatrain Inc. <br />President Ira E. McKeever's visit to the <br />Craig City Council Tuesday night to in- <br />form area residents of changes in the <br />aqua train concept and to seek public in- , <br />put. <br />The aqua train will not go the way of <br />the Alaska Pipeline because Aquatrain <br />Inc., a wholly-owned subsidary of W.R. <br />Grace Company, seeks public input and <br />representatives travel through affected <br />areas informing people even before the <br />environmental impact statement is <br />sought. McKeever said. <br />McKeever, who began working on the <br />project when it started 18 months ago, <br />said he enjoys educating the public on <br />the project because, "the public is kick- <br />ing the idea around and we are getting <br />mput from them." Usually the govern- <br />ment and industry inform the public <br />after a major project is complete, but <br />Aquatrain Inc. is doin~ it backwards. <br />Using liquid carbon dioxide as the <br />transporting medium, the proposed <br />aquatrain will carry coal ground to the <br />size of salt crystalS through a 1,300 mile <br />pipeline, which will connect the crucial <br />coal producing areas in Colorado, Utah <br />and Wyomingto the power plants In <br />J...1tah, Nevada and California. <br />Formerly the plan was to use <br />brackish or saline water to transport <br />bags of coal, but the company dropped <br />this idea in favor 01 the liquid carbon <br />dioxide because of speed, less pipeline <br />corrosion and contamination of the pro- <br />duct. <br />The carbon dioxide is more slippery <br />than water and can carry the coal slurry <br />IS miles per hour compared to the 3-4 <br />mph speed the water offered, said Mike <br />Clinton. project manager for the Saline <br />Water Project and Use Project Office of <br />the Bureau of Land Reclamation. a <br />federal group working to alleviate <br />salinity problems in the Colorado River <br />drainage system. <br />Also with carbon dioxide. bags are <br />unecessarybecause coal does not react <br />with carbon dioxide and will arrive at <br />Its destination in the same condition it <br />started, said McKeever. That way the <br />coal mine can grind the coal to the exact <br />specifications reqUired by the plant pur. <br />chasing the coal more than 1,000 miles <br />awav. <br />Since the liquid carbon dioxide and <br />coal do not react, the coal will not be <br />damaged during transportation. <br />Another advantage the less viscous <br />carbon dioxide has over water is it can <br />carry more coal at one time than water <br />and retain the same viscosity, he ex- <br />')Iained. When mixing by weight, the <br />pipeline can carry up to 82 percent coal <br />and 18 percent water and still travel as <br />quickly through the line as water. <br />An identified prolem with using liquid <br />carbon dioxide is that to remain in li- <br />quid form it must be kept 88 degrees <br />fahrenheit or under and maintain 60{). <br />700 pounds per square inch of pressure, <br />so the line must be buried in its entirety <br />and probably insulated, said McKeever. <br />The pipeline will still dispense of un- <br />wanted saline water abundant in the <br />Colorado River Basin area, <br />The carbon dioxide will <br />transport coal through the line for 3-4 <br />weeks, then for one week saline water <br />will move through the line toward power <br />plants along the way, saId Clinton. The <br />plants use the water for cooling pur- <br />poses. <br />In effect, the coal transporting project <br />is subsidizing the dispersion of saline <br />water from the area, said McKeever. <br />For this reason, .tbe Bureau of Land <br />Reclamation Is In on the project and the <br />project received several approving nods <br />from environmental groups, he added. <br />fne oureau is responsible for reduc- <br />ing the salloity of the water to meet na- <br />tional water quality standards before <br /> <br /> <br />01((;0 <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />,-----_ i <br />"-_J <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />( .. I I ~ U ~ <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />'Al"O."'A \IIARRY ALLEN <br />\ <br /> <br /> <br />By PERRIE McMILLEN <br />SlaHwrlter <br /> <br />r-'--.-- -.-___---J <br />-\ <br />--, <br />" <br />'--, <br />\ <br /> <br />\ <br />from the problem areas in the Big Sandy River area in <br />Wyoming, Glenwood-Dotsero Springs in Colorado and <br />Price-San Rafael Rivers area in Utah to designated <br />power plants, which would use it as a cooling agent. <br />The maior user of the saline water would be the Inter- <br />mountain Power Plant where Aquatrain Inc. President Ira <br />E. McKeever said the project Is paying to install two cool- <br />Ing towers speCially designed to utilize saline water. <br />The coal.fired power plants listed on the map are iden- <br />tified as potential customers for use of the coal <br />transported through the aquatrain pipeline. <br />The only coal.fired plant along the line that is already <br />constructed is the Reid-Gardner Plant, while the rest are <br />In differing stages of development, said McKeever. All <br />have been contacted as potential customers. <br />When the slurry reaches its destination, it is separated <br />from the liquid carbon dioxide in a special instrument <br />called a cyclone, which basically separates the <br />substances by -using gravity at less cost \han conven- <br />tional means of separation, McKeever explained. <br /> <br />1 <br />, , r <br />V"" ..t^-__.._O..\, <br />1 <br /> <br />'0. II 0 I <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />1--- <br /> <br />" A . It ().. ~ <br />COLO. ~/"E. INDIAN .Es. <br /> <br />LO "U/JtE CPHDbax <br />a.IC.4TION DlS1~1CT <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />l <br /> <br />---- <br /> <br />'---- <br /> <br />"---- <br /> <br />.----- <br /> <br />,M1'lro <br /> <br />The first curve in the S shape formed by the proposed <br />aquatraln pipeline, weaves through the crucial coal pro- <br />ducing areas, including Moffat County, and heads west <br />to the coal users in Utah, Nevada and California. <br />Aquatrain Inc. proposes transporting coal slurry using <br />liquid carbon dioxide as a medium via pipeline from the <br />coal mines in Southwestern Wyoming, Western Col- <br />orado and Eastern Utah and carrying it to the designated <br />power plants. <br />The coal is taken to a central preparation plant where it <br />is ground and put into the pipeline. locations for the pro- <br />posed preparation .plants have not yet been identified, <br />but there may be one in Moffat County Ind in <br />Southwestern Wyoming, said Aquatrain Inc, President <br />Ira E. McKeever. <br />On an alternating basis with the coal and liquid carbon <br />dioxide mix, the pipeline will also transport saline water <br /> <br />the water reaches Mexico, said Clinton. <br />The project could receive as much as <br />a 25 percent federal enerlY tax credtt <br />lor the cost of the $3 billion project <br />because the pulverized caol shipped <br />through the pipeline would be con- <br />sidered as an alternative energy source. <br />By year 2000 the bureau is supposed to <br />have Colorado River salinity levels <br />back at the measured point 10 1972, he <br />said.At the outside the bureau could pay <br />for about 25 percent of the project <br />through federal fUDds, Clinton added, <br />According to CHnton, the planning <br />stage for the $3 billion aquatratn project <br />should be complete this summer, at <br />which lime the environmental impact <br />statement project will belln. Construc- <br />tion of the project is scheduled to begin <br />In 1987, with a tentative completion date <br />in 1m. CHnton's estimation includes <br />two years floating time. According to <br />McKeever, the earliest possible comple- <br />tion date would be September 1917, <br />McKeever predicts the project would <br />generate about 1,200 long-term. .base <br />jobs in the Craig area, with more Jobs <br />resulting from the potential prosperity. <br />The company Js trying to structure <br />the project to generate long-term <br />employment, and the magnitude of <br />employment depends on how much coal <br />moves through the line, said Clinton. <br />The cost to send a ton of coal from <br />Craig to Long Beach, Cal. by rail is <br />about '28 per ton. and McKeever said <br />that cost should be reduced to about $19 <br />per ton using the aquatrain. The RoinR <br /> <br />price for a ton of coal is about $25. <br />United States coal is priced out of the <br />international. market because of the <br />bilb transportation costs, he added. <br />But the major advantage Is that cost <br />escalation for use of the aqua train is <br />leas than cost escalaHon for coal <br />transportation, McKeever said.Most of <br />the aquatraln cost is in construction <br />with only 15 percent subject to escala- <br />tion. but 55 percent of coal transporta- <br />tion costs are variable and subject to <br />escalation, he esplained. <br />The result is that railroad costs will <br />rile with inflation while aquatrain costs <br />will remain relatively stable, so the <br />future benefits outweigh the Immediate <br />ODes, he added. <br />Addreninl the problem of croSSing <br />railroad tracks, McKeever said since <br />reducinl the salinity of area water is In <br />the public interest and backed by the <br />federallovernment, the project should <br />have the r1&bts of eminent domaIn. He <br />a1so pointed out that Interested railroad <br />companies, coal companies or any other <br />company bas the opportunity to buy into <br />the project. <br />W.R, Grace Company set goals at the <br />outset of the project and McKeever said <br />he constantly refers back to those loals <br />to determine if the project is on the right <br />track. The first goal was to substantial- <br />ly affect the salinity of the Colorado <br />River by collecting the salt sources <br />before they enter the river. <br />Second on the project gaalUst was to <br />effectively subsidize the removal pro- <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />i <br />-'---j <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />"'0"", (; <br /> <br />,.,., <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />, I." "' f ~ I r 0 <br /> <br />" , <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />cess by developing a cost-effective coal <br />transportation system, and this gopl <br />will be met by the aquatrain liqUid car- <br />bon dioxide carrier. <br />The two goals Aquatrain Inc. must <br />still work out is to; obtain long-term <br />energy contracts to stabilize the socio- <br />economic fluctuations of areas affected <br />by the development, and stabilize the <br />cost of power to the end customer, said <br />McKeever. <br />"1 think it (the aquatrain} can actual- <br />ly reduce the current costs of power, but <br />I know it will reduce Increases in cost," <br />said McKeever. <br />The project analysis also addressed <br />the problem of what to do with the car- <br />bon dioxide once It has travelled <br />through the line. McKeever said the <br />company is considering the tertiary use <br />of carbon dioxide as a scrubbing agent <br />for hydrocarbons. However, if this use <br />does not work out, the next alternative <br />Is to pump the the carbon dioxide back <br />and reuse It for transportation, he said. <br />Looking toward the future, McKeever <br />predicted the possibility of transporting <br />other commodities such as soda ash <br />prevalent in Wyoming, and grains, <br />which could becarried in the liquid car- <br />bon dioxide to Mexico, a major importer <br />of American grain or shipped to Japan, <br />McKeever said. <br />Currently the United States ships five <br />million tons of grain per year to Mexico <br />and 20 million to Japan, he said. "By the <br />year 2000 we may be moving 60.80 <br />milU~n tons of products per year." <br />