<br />.-'
<br />
<br />"0
<br />I.f)
<br />(.\]
<br />.-.t
<br />(u'"
<br />Co')
<br />
<br />". eJ
<br />
<br />10- The DaHy Pre..- Wedne.day, hbruary t, 1883
<br />
<br />Unique aquatrain concept ~xplained
<br />
<br />By PERRIIt Melin-LEN
<br />Staff writer
<br />
<br />It would SDake throup 1,300 mUes of
<br />western territory carrylBl an annual 30
<br />million tons of cnnbed coal In liquid
<br />carbon dioxide, and If everything goes
<br />well it could save area eoal companies
<br />more than SO percent In transportation
<br />costs, as well as disposing of unwanted
<br />saline water from the Colorado River
<br />drainage system.
<br />It's the Aquatrain.
<br />Still only a concept, the aqua train
<br />idea is growing dynamically as
<br />representatives of Aquatrain Inc.
<br />receive public input at many levels and
<br />feed the information into the overall
<br />plan for the system.
<br />An example of this information-
<br />gathering process is Aquatrain Inc.
<br />President Ira E. McKeever's visit to the
<br />Craig City Council Tuesday night to in-
<br />form area residents of changes in the
<br />aqua train concept and to seek public in- ,
<br />put.
<br />The aqua train will not go the way of
<br />the Alaska Pipeline because Aquatrain
<br />Inc., a wholly-owned subsidary of W.R.
<br />Grace Company, seeks public input and
<br />representatives travel through affected
<br />areas informing people even before the
<br />environmental impact statement is
<br />sought. McKeever said.
<br />McKeever, who began working on the
<br />project when it started 18 months ago,
<br />said he enjoys educating the public on
<br />the project because, "the public is kick-
<br />ing the idea around and we are getting
<br />mput from them." Usually the govern-
<br />ment and industry inform the public
<br />after a major project is complete, but
<br />Aquatrain Inc. is doin~ it backwards.
<br />Using liquid carbon dioxide as the
<br />transporting medium, the proposed
<br />aquatrain will carry coal ground to the
<br />size of salt crystalS through a 1,300 mile
<br />pipeline, which will connect the crucial
<br />coal producing areas in Colorado, Utah
<br />and Wyomingto the power plants In
<br />J...1tah, Nevada and California.
<br />Formerly the plan was to use
<br />brackish or saline water to transport
<br />bags of coal, but the company dropped
<br />this idea in favor 01 the liquid carbon
<br />dioxide because of speed, less pipeline
<br />corrosion and contamination of the pro-
<br />duct.
<br />The carbon dioxide is more slippery
<br />than water and can carry the coal slurry
<br />IS miles per hour compared to the 3-4
<br />mph speed the water offered, said Mike
<br />Clinton. project manager for the Saline
<br />Water Project and Use Project Office of
<br />the Bureau of Land Reclamation. a
<br />federal group working to alleviate
<br />salinity problems in the Colorado River
<br />drainage system.
<br />Also with carbon dioxide. bags are
<br />unecessarybecause coal does not react
<br />with carbon dioxide and will arrive at
<br />Its destination in the same condition it
<br />started, said McKeever. That way the
<br />coal mine can grind the coal to the exact
<br />specifications reqUired by the plant pur.
<br />chasing the coal more than 1,000 miles
<br />awav.
<br />Since the liquid carbon dioxide and
<br />coal do not react, the coal will not be
<br />damaged during transportation.
<br />Another advantage the less viscous
<br />carbon dioxide has over water is it can
<br />carry more coal at one time than water
<br />and retain the same viscosity, he ex-
<br />')Iained. When mixing by weight, the
<br />pipeline can carry up to 82 percent coal
<br />and 18 percent water and still travel as
<br />quickly through the line as water.
<br />An identified prolem with using liquid
<br />carbon dioxide is that to remain in li-
<br />quid form it must be kept 88 degrees
<br />fahrenheit or under and maintain 60{).
<br />700 pounds per square inch of pressure,
<br />so the line must be buried in its entirety
<br />and probably insulated, said McKeever.
<br />The pipeline will still dispense of un-
<br />wanted saline water abundant in the
<br />Colorado River Basin area,
<br />The carbon dioxide will
<br />transport coal through the line for 3-4
<br />weeks, then for one week saline water
<br />will move through the line toward power
<br />plants along the way, saId Clinton. The
<br />plants use the water for cooling pur-
<br />poses.
<br />In effect, the coal transporting project
<br />is subsidizing the dispersion of saline
<br />water from the area, said McKeever.
<br />For this reason, .tbe Bureau of Land
<br />Reclamation Is In on the project and the
<br />project received several approving nods
<br />from environmental groups, he added.
<br />fne oureau is responsible for reduc-
<br />ing the salloity of the water to meet na-
<br />tional water quality standards before
<br />
<br />
<br />01((;0
<br />
<br />'-
<br />
<br />,-----_ i
<br />"-_J
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />
<br />( .. I I ~ U ~
<br />
<br />\
<br />\
<br />'Al"O."'A \IIARRY ALLEN
<br />\
<br />
<br />
<br />By PERRIE McMILLEN
<br />SlaHwrlter
<br />
<br />r-'--.-- -.-___---J
<br />-\
<br />--,
<br />"
<br />'--,
<br />\
<br />
<br />\
<br />from the problem areas in the Big Sandy River area in
<br />Wyoming, Glenwood-Dotsero Springs in Colorado and
<br />Price-San Rafael Rivers area in Utah to designated
<br />power plants, which would use it as a cooling agent.
<br />The maior user of the saline water would be the Inter-
<br />mountain Power Plant where Aquatrain Inc. President Ira
<br />E. McKeever said the project Is paying to install two cool-
<br />Ing towers speCially designed to utilize saline water.
<br />The coal.fired power plants listed on the map are iden-
<br />tified as potential customers for use of the coal
<br />transported through the aquatrain pipeline.
<br />The only coal.fired plant along the line that is already
<br />constructed is the Reid-Gardner Plant, while the rest are
<br />In differing stages of development, said McKeever. All
<br />have been contacted as potential customers.
<br />When the slurry reaches its destination, it is separated
<br />from the liquid carbon dioxide in a special instrument
<br />called a cyclone, which basically separates the
<br />substances by -using gravity at less cost \han conven-
<br />tional means of separation, McKeever explained.
<br />
<br />1
<br />, , r
<br />V"" ..t^-__.._O..\,
<br />1
<br />
<br />'0. II 0 I
<br />
<br />.~
<br />
<br />1---
<br />
<br />" A . It ().. ~
<br />COLO. ~/"E. INDIAN .Es.
<br />
<br />LO "U/JtE CPHDbax
<br />a.IC.4TION DlS1~1CT
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />l
<br />
<br />----
<br />
<br />'----
<br />
<br />"----
<br />
<br />.-----
<br />
<br />,M1'lro
<br />
<br />The first curve in the S shape formed by the proposed
<br />aquatraln pipeline, weaves through the crucial coal pro-
<br />ducing areas, including Moffat County, and heads west
<br />to the coal users in Utah, Nevada and California.
<br />Aquatrain Inc. proposes transporting coal slurry using
<br />liquid carbon dioxide as a medium via pipeline from the
<br />coal mines in Southwestern Wyoming, Western Col-
<br />orado and Eastern Utah and carrying it to the designated
<br />power plants.
<br />The coal is taken to a central preparation plant where it
<br />is ground and put into the pipeline. locations for the pro-
<br />posed preparation .plants have not yet been identified,
<br />but there may be one in Moffat County Ind in
<br />Southwestern Wyoming, said Aquatrain Inc, President
<br />Ira E. McKeever.
<br />On an alternating basis with the coal and liquid carbon
<br />dioxide mix, the pipeline will also transport saline water
<br />
<br />the water reaches Mexico, said Clinton.
<br />The project could receive as much as
<br />a 25 percent federal enerlY tax credtt
<br />lor the cost of the $3 billion project
<br />because the pulverized caol shipped
<br />through the pipeline would be con-
<br />sidered as an alternative energy source.
<br />By year 2000 the bureau is supposed to
<br />have Colorado River salinity levels
<br />back at the measured point 10 1972, he
<br />said.At the outside the bureau could pay
<br />for about 25 percent of the project
<br />through federal fUDds, Clinton added,
<br />According to CHnton, the planning
<br />stage for the $3 billion aquatratn project
<br />should be complete this summer, at
<br />which lime the environmental impact
<br />statement project will belln. Construc-
<br />tion of the project is scheduled to begin
<br />In 1987, with a tentative completion date
<br />in 1m. CHnton's estimation includes
<br />two years floating time. According to
<br />McKeever, the earliest possible comple-
<br />tion date would be September 1917,
<br />McKeever predicts the project would
<br />generate about 1,200 long-term. .base
<br />jobs in the Craig area, with more Jobs
<br />resulting from the potential prosperity.
<br />The company Js trying to structure
<br />the project to generate long-term
<br />employment, and the magnitude of
<br />employment depends on how much coal
<br />moves through the line, said Clinton.
<br />The cost to send a ton of coal from
<br />Craig to Long Beach, Cal. by rail is
<br />about '28 per ton. and McKeever said
<br />that cost should be reduced to about $19
<br />per ton using the aquatrain. The RoinR
<br />
<br />price for a ton of coal is about $25.
<br />United States coal is priced out of the
<br />international. market because of the
<br />bilb transportation costs, he added.
<br />But the major advantage Is that cost
<br />escalation for use of the aqua train is
<br />leas than cost escalaHon for coal
<br />transportation, McKeever said.Most of
<br />the aquatraln cost is in construction
<br />with only 15 percent subject to escala-
<br />tion. but 55 percent of coal transporta-
<br />tion costs are variable and subject to
<br />escalation, he esplained.
<br />The result is that railroad costs will
<br />rile with inflation while aquatrain costs
<br />will remain relatively stable, so the
<br />future benefits outweigh the Immediate
<br />ODes, he added.
<br />Addreninl the problem of croSSing
<br />railroad tracks, McKeever said since
<br />reducinl the salinity of area water is In
<br />the public interest and backed by the
<br />federallovernment, the project should
<br />have the r1&bts of eminent domaIn. He
<br />a1so pointed out that Interested railroad
<br />companies, coal companies or any other
<br />company bas the opportunity to buy into
<br />the project.
<br />W.R, Grace Company set goals at the
<br />outset of the project and McKeever said
<br />he constantly refers back to those loals
<br />to determine if the project is on the right
<br />track. The first goal was to substantial-
<br />ly affect the salinity of the Colorado
<br />River by collecting the salt sources
<br />before they enter the river.
<br />Second on the project gaalUst was to
<br />effectively subsidize the removal pro-
<br />
<br />r
<br />
<br />i
<br />-'---j
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />" .
<br />
<br />"'0"", (;
<br />
<br />,.,.,
<br />
<br />'"
<br />
<br />i
<br />I
<br />
<br />, I." "' f ~ I r 0
<br />
<br />" ,
<br />
<br />r
<br />
<br />cess by developing a cost-effective coal
<br />transportation system, and this gopl
<br />will be met by the aquatrain liqUid car-
<br />bon dioxide carrier.
<br />The two goals Aquatrain Inc. must
<br />still work out is to; obtain long-term
<br />energy contracts to stabilize the socio-
<br />economic fluctuations of areas affected
<br />by the development, and stabilize the
<br />cost of power to the end customer, said
<br />McKeever.
<br />"1 think it (the aquatrain} can actual-
<br />ly reduce the current costs of power, but
<br />I know it will reduce Increases in cost,"
<br />said McKeever.
<br />The project analysis also addressed
<br />the problem of what to do with the car-
<br />bon dioxide once It has travelled
<br />through the line. McKeever said the
<br />company is considering the tertiary use
<br />of carbon dioxide as a scrubbing agent
<br />for hydrocarbons. However, if this use
<br />does not work out, the next alternative
<br />Is to pump the the carbon dioxide back
<br />and reuse It for transportation, he said.
<br />Looking toward the future, McKeever
<br />predicted the possibility of transporting
<br />other commodities such as soda ash
<br />prevalent in Wyoming, and grains,
<br />which could becarried in the liquid car-
<br />bon dioxide to Mexico, a major importer
<br />of American grain or shipped to Japan,
<br />McKeever said.
<br />Currently the United States ships five
<br />million tons of grain per year to Mexico
<br />and 20 million to Japan, he said. "By the
<br />year 2000 we may be moving 60.80
<br />milU~n tons of products per year."
<br />
|