Laserfiche WebLink
<br />('.J <br />~ <br />C:".1 <br />rl <br />(. ' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />THE WALL STREET JOURNAL <br /> <br />Tuesday, June 1, 1982 <br /> <br />....-... <br /> <br />IA Coal Company's Way to Pacify <br />I ' <br />!Environmentalists: 'Use 'Baggies' <br /> <br />: Bv A"" HCGH.-y bags would be burned. <br />, ' <br />, S'aff REporter of TilE W ALl. STRE~;," Jot;SNAL For at least 20 years. a variety of camba- <br />i NEW YORK - Any propo," , to ship tants. including environmentalists and rail' <br />]crushed coal. or slurry. through water in a roads. have fought the water pipelining of <br />,pipeline makes environmentalists do a slow coal. Coal operators and utilities want the <br />i burn, Coal operators. from time to time. pipelines. It would require legislation to set. <br />! may have asked. "What are we supposed to tie many regulatory. water'rights and right. <br />I do with the stuff? Wrap it in Baggies?" of,way problems. " <br />, That's what one corporate coal miner. <br />[w.R. Grace & Co.. now has in mind. Its The 'Aquatrain' <br />i plastic "Baggles." however. are hardly your Ira McKeever. president of Grace's west. <br />; garden,variety supermarket kind, Each ern mining division, says its bag pipeline, or <br />iwould be nearly two feet in diameter and 10 "aquatrain." wouid cost about $2.5 billion <br />: feet long, including the cost of coaJ~bagging plants: <br />Protecting Coal and Water The Zlf-inch pipeline, Grace says, could <br />Grace mines coal in Colorado. and it also move about 15 million tons ot ,coal a year <br />makes specialty plastics. among other from Grace and other coal suppliers in the <br />, ' pipeline venture. <br />thmgs, It proposes usmg water from the <br />salt'polluted Upper Colorado River basin to The pipeline shipping cost would be no <br />Icarry baggtd'Colorado coal through a pipe- higher than the S28 a Ion it now costs to ship <br />line to the West Coast. The bags would pro, coal by rail from northwest Colorado to <br />teet the cleaned and processed coal from Long Beacli, Calif" Mr. MCKeeveJ'isays. The <br />salt and keep the coal from further dirtying future cost would rise more slowlfthan rail <br />the water. Once on the Wesl Coast, the salt costs, he says. because the variable costs-I <br />water could drain inlo the Pacific already such as labor and fuel-of operating a pipe- <br />tainled with salt. But Grace officials say lhe line make up a much smaller proportion of: <br />IdwnPing would be done very carefully to tolal operating costs than lhe variable costs <br />avoid damage to nearby marine life. The of running a railroad. <br />