My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01713
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:24 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:37:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1987
Title
Comments re: GCES Draft Technical Integration Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Paqe <br /> <br />eomments <br /> <br />reader to conclude that the study methods are valid. The report should <br />state the assumptions used, the methods utilized to minimize bias, and <br />a measure of confidence in the results. <br /> <br />C-35 How much of a problem are launch windows when put in the context of the <br />NPS restrictions on the total number of raft trips allowed annually. <br />Does the reluctance of outfitters to launch on weekends due to <br />fluctuating flows benefit the day-trip rafters who may favor weekends? <br /> <br />C-60 eonclusion (1) states that "normal dam operations have been, to a <br />considerable extent, conducive to white-water recreation. . ." and <br />that fishing flows have been reasonable also. THis fact has not been <br />given appropriate attention in the main body of the report. <br /> <br />C-62 The recommendations on this page fail to address long-term effects to <br />the same recreational resource, such as how rapidS will be affected if <br />fluctuations are minimized and flood releases eliminated. <br /> <br />D-4 1st paragraph. 1st sentence. General note: The phrase ". lives, <br />industry, and recreation" seems to be an inappropriate mix of <br />elements. It is to be inferred that power generation and water <br />delivery are lesser priorities than recreation? <br /> <br />1st paragraph. 4th sentence. General note: The phrase liThe economic <br />health, recreational opportunities, and growth potential. . ." seems <br />to be an inappropriate mix of factors relating to the management of the <br />eo10rado River. No mention is made of the "real" management <br />priorities. <br /> <br />D-4 1st paragraph. 6th sentence. General note: Glen eanyon is not the <br />only facility of eRSP on the eo10rado River. Glen eanyon, in <br />conjunction with these other facilities have impact on the "lives. <br />industry, etc.", not just Glen Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />D-6 1st paragraph. 2nd sentence. Include Gunnison River as additional <br />tributary to the eolorado River. <br /> <br />3rd para. 2nd sentence. ehange "3,33D,DDO kilowatts" to "3,624,ODD <br />kilowatts". (WAPA, 1986 Annual Report) <br /> <br />Maybe we need another paragraph on the * on consumers in the Basin, $ <br />annual revenues, and overall economic impacts of hydropower. <br /> <br />D-7 2nd para. 2nd sentence. ehange "Lees Ferry" to "Lee Ferry". Lee <br />Ferry is the Compact point. Lees Fery is where the gaging station is <br />and where the rafters begin their trips. <br /> <br />D-8 2nd para. Last sentence. ehange "Aspinall" to "eurecanti". <br />Technically, the eRSP Act authorized the eurecanti Unit, which later <br />was renamed the Aspinall Unit. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.