My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01689
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01689
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:16 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:36:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.400
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1962
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Ruedi-Western Slope Investigations Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />""" .t'~... /"'" <br />~"1~') <br />BASALT PROJEC'l' <br /> <br /> <br />PLAN SELECTION AND ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />area would be diverted at the outlet of the Missouri Heights Reservoir <br />and then siphoned across Roaring Fork River and used in the same manner <br />as in Plan 3. <br /> <br />Plans 5 through 11 <br /> <br />These plans would add lands in the Carbondale area to those that <br />would be irrigated under Plans 3 and 4. The total project irrigated area <br />would thus be 20,489 acres as in the adopted plan (Plan 8), including <br />14,362 acres of full service land and 6,127 acres of supplemental serv- <br />ice land. <br /> <br />Plan 5 is essentially the same as the adopted plan except that the <br />Missouri Heights Reservoir would not be utilized and the Basalt Conduit <br />would have a larger capacity (275 second-feet) and ,muld be at a lower <br />alignment. The Basalt Conduit would terminate on the drainage channel <br />on which the Missouri Heights Reservoir is located but at a point 50 <br />feet below the reservoir outlet. The Landis Canal would head at the <br />terminus of the conduit. The Carbondale Canal and other facilities <br />required for service to the Carbondale and Sopris areas would be the <br />same as in the adopted plan. <br /> <br />In Plan 6 the Basalt Conduit would be at the higher alignment as in <br />the adopted plan. Its capacity would be 250 second-feet above a turnout <br />for the Stockman's ditch and 195 second-feet from the turnout to the <br />Missouri Heights Reservoir. The reservoir would be enlar~ed to a capac- <br />ity of 6,600 acre-feet, compared with 21,500 acre-feet in the adopted <br />plan. Distribution facilities for the Cattle Creek area would be the <br />same as in the adopted plan. The Stockman's ditch turnout on the Basalt <br />Canal would be at the same general location as in Plan 3. The drop from <br />the turnout to the siphon across Roaring Fork would be greater than in <br />Plan 3, however. The Stockman's ditch would be enlarged and extended <br />to serve project lands in the Sopris area. The Carbondale Canal with <br />a capacity of 30 second-feet would extend southwest from the terminus <br />of the Stockman's ditch extension, conveying water to landS in the Car- <br />bondale area. <br /> <br />Plan 7 is identical to Plan 6 except that the Missouri Heights Res- <br />ervoir would be enlarged to a capacity of 14,500 acre-feet, thus permit- <br />ting the capacity of the Basalt Conduit to be reduced to 155 second-feet <br />above the Stockman's turnout and 100 second-feet below the turnout. <br /> <br />Plan 8 is the adopted plan described and analyzed in detail in pre- <br />vious chapters of this report. <br /> <br />Plan 9 is the same as the adopted plan except that the Basalt Con- <br />duit would be constructed at the lower and less costly location and the <br />Missouri Heights Pumping Plant with a capacity of 100 second-feet and a <br /> <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.