Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SJRRIP Biology Committee "Program Evaluation Report" states: "Contaminants were not <br />shown to be major concern in the San Juan River at this time." <br /> <br />Page 18 'There is belief that a more natural hydro graph may result in some natural control of <br />nnnn'lt;""," t,,,h" Th;" ...t."t.:......,""~,t ....\.."..1..-1 h"" .."".....,.....,,""....1 h""..........."'.."" ;t ~" ,..,.....t t....."" ."nrl ,.1",0.,", ".....t rpnpf't thp <br />...............u.... .....Hi . Ill.... "'UL,,",Ul"'UL .,......un.... U""' ................... u...........u....... ,..... BV' LlU..... ""'...... ....v....... u'V. ............. .u_ <br /> <br />most current data, The data in the San Juan River shows that high spring flows had NO impact <br />on the amount of nonnative fish biomass. Page 3-51 of the SJRRIP Biology Committee <br />"Program Evaluation Report" states: 'This infonnation suggests that higher flows resulting from <br />the re-operation of the Navajo Dam were not detrimental to channel catfish and common carp, <br />" <br /> <br />Page 20, last sentence under Razorback - Remove "benefit this species and" The flows are to <br />improve habitat only, the impact on the species is not yet known, <br /> <br />Page 25, first full paragraph - The statement "The more natural hydrograph downstream from <br />Fannington may benefit these species reducing nonnative fish that compete and by providing <br />more natural habitat conditions." should be changed to "It is not known if a more natural <br />hydrograph downstream from Famlington may benefit the roundtail chub," See comment on <br />Page 18, There is simply no data to indicate one way or another what roundtail chub need <br />therefore, unfounded speculation should not be included, <br /> <br />~&'~;~ <br />