Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />"described in the SJRBRIP Long Range Plan" <br /> <br />Line 5695 to 5698 - Suggest sentence be reworded to "The recommended alternative will allow <br />the provisions of the ESA Section consultations to be implemented in order to complete NIIP <br /> <br />..........-1 ....~_~+_.~+ ^ T n ~~ ...~11 ~~ .....L....._ ...f.._.... ............. ..-1..........1.......................... <br />u..aIU "-'Vll;:)LIU'-'L r\.L!, a;:) VV\,...11 U.::l, VLlI\,.,l 1llllU.... \<YUll,.,1 U....V...dVpllll,.,lH. <br /> <br />Line 5705 - An expanded summary is recommended, Maybe a table that lists impacts for each <br />major area, <br /> <br />Biological Opinion Comments <br /> <br />Proiect Description <br />General - The descriptions should be identical to the EIS and they are not. <br /> <br />First and second paragraphs - Use same purpose and need as in EIS <br /> <br />Third paragraph - The entire paragraph is not part of the action, Should be restated as generally <br />meeting the Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />Sixth and eighth paragraphs - Higher winter releases are not the only potential use of short tenn <br />unused water. Notification that there may be other uses should be included, <br /> <br />( Ninth paragraph - Adaptive management is part of the SJRBRlP. Is it also part of the EIS <br />~tion? Only recognized in EIS not implemented, <br /> <br />Flow Recommendations <br />First paragraph, second sentence - add "believed to be" between "that is .,.. necessary" <br /> <br />Second paragraph, 4th sentence - "for the endangered species" to " for the creation of habitat for <br />the endangered species" <br /> <br />Suggest the summary of flow recommendations be removed and refer to Flow Reconilllendation <br />Report, <br /> <br />Species Accounts <br /> <br />Endangered Spices subsection: <br /> <br />In Colorado PikemilUlOw, second paragraph - The latest estimate of number of pikeminnow in <br />the San Juan is 19 made by Dale Ryden, The "fewer than 100 maybe fewer than 50" is not <br />correct based on the best available population estimate. <br /> <br />\ There are several places (p. 17 &18) in this section that refer to "water quality problems" and <br />"water contaminants may affect the fish"; all of these types of statements should be removed <br />because they are incorrect and do not reflect current data, For example on Page 3-57 of the <br /> <br />O(),S2~ <br />