Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CRBSCP, Protective and Regukllory' Pumping Unit <br /> <br />t;.> <br /><;:) <br />'"'-1 <br />0',) <br /> <br />and its design capacity increases 8S it passes each well. <br />The concrete-lined open channel has a lining thickness of <br />2.5 inches and a bottom width that ranges from 4 to 6 <br />feel. Water depths Tange from 2.8 to 5.8 feet with water <br />velocities from 3.6 to 4.8 feet per second. Two settling <br />basins have been constructed within the open channel <br />portion of the lateral to provide storage capacity for the <br />accumulation of 6ediment, mostly windblown sand. A <br />.stand box, 8 vertical open structure which serves as a re- <br />lief vent, is located at each well site along the pipeline <br />to eliminate water hammer. The end of the 242 con- <br />veyance channel, the terminal discharge pipeline, is a <br />72-inch reinforced concrete pipe designed to carry 220 <br />cubic feet per second of pumped water. <br /> <br />Attendant Facilities <br /> <br />A 12-mile-long access road was constructed along side the <br />242 Lateral and the well sites. This road serves the <br />construction, operation, and maintenance of the unit <br />facilities. <br /> <br />The Department of Energy's Western Area Power <br />Administration (W APA) has constructed a 69-kilovolt <br />transmission line east of Yuma to WAPA's Sonora <br />Substation, located about 18 miles south and slightly <br />west of Gila Substation. The Sonora Substation is also <br />located about 2.5 miles north of well 242-22, the eastern <br />end of the well field. To distribute power to the existing <br />well pumps.. a 34.5-kilovolt transmission line connects <br />Sonora Substation with the 34.5-kilovolt transmission <br />line constructed next to the access road and conveyance <br />system. The 34.5-kilovolt electrical distribution system <br />also connects to the Yuma County Water Users' Associa- <br />tion's system at the western end of the well field. The <br />W APA facilities were completed in 1983. <br /> <br />~rater deliveries to Mexico at the Southerly Interna- <br />tional Boundary will be coordinated with deliveries to <br />the Northerly International Boundary located between <br />California and Mexico. This will minimize overdeli,'eries <br />to Mexico. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife <br /> <br />The development of the Protective and Regulatory <br />Pumping Unit (and also the Desalting Complex Unit) will <br />result in the loss of fish and wildlife habitat. Mitigation <br />measures will replace about 65 percent of these losses. <br />The mitigation measures were not originally authorized <br />under Title I of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Con. <br />trol Act, but are included in amendatory legisJation ' <br />_ Public Law 96-336, dated September 1978, <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Hiatory <br /> <br />During the negotiations between the United States and <br />Mexico that were to resolve the salinity problems of the <br />Colorado River water delivered to Mexico (Minute No. <br />242), the United Slates Government brought to the <br />aUention of the Mexican Government that the ground <br />water underlying the United States was being withdrawn <br />by Mexican pumping. This was due to operation of a I <br />well field that Mexico had installed immediately south of <br />the Southerly International Boundary. It was recognized <br />by the United States that this withdrawal of ground <br />water would significantly affect the United States in <br />several areas, particularly since Mexico expressed the <br />intention to continue pumping from the well field to <br />supply irrigation water to Mexican agricultural lands. <br />Among other things.. Minute No. 242 stipulates that <br />the United States and Mexico will limit ground-water <br />pumping within each country to 160,000 acre-feet an- <br />nually within 5 miles of the Arizona/Sonora border. By <br />pumping these waters, Mexico withdraws ground water <br />from the United States without credit for delivery of <br />water from the United States to Mexico in accordance <br />with treaty obligations. <br /> <br />Yuma Valley agricultural drainage and rrngation waste <br />are delhrered to the Mexjcan canal system and are <br />credited toward the 1.5 million acre-feet-per-year delivery I <br />requirement of Colorado River water to Mexico. Histori. <br />call}', these annual fJows have been about 125,000 <br />acre-feet of drainage returns and 15,000 acre.feet of <br />regulatory waste (unused irrigation water) from the <br />Y urns CanaJ system. Pumping by Mexico and the United <br />States has lowered the ground.water elevations and is I <br />reducing the amount of drainage underflows from Yuma <br />Valley. The annual combined flow of about 140,000 <br />acre-feet per year at the Southerly International Boun- <br />dary will gradually decline to only 15,000 acre-feet per <br />year. The Protecth'e and Regularory Pumping Unit is <br />intended to maintain deliveries near the 140,000 <br />acre-foot level. <br /> <br />To maintain the treaty flow to Mexico, any reduction in <br />deliveries at the Southerly International Boundary <br />would have to be made up at the Northerly Interna- <br />tional Boundary by increased deliveries of water from I <br />other sources. Under present conditions, this can be done <br />only by releasing additional stored river water not now <br />committed to Mexico. <br /> <br />In compliance with Minute No, 242 and Section 103 (a) <br />of the Colarado River Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974, <br />a memorandum report was prepared on protective and <br />