Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4. Why does the SLCA <br />believe it must study the <br />replacement of this loss? <br /> <br /> <br />5. What is the relationship <br />between this Replacement <br />Resource methods <br />process, Reclamation's <br />Glen Canyon Dam f/S, <br />the SLCA/IP Electric <br />Power Marketing flS, and <br />Western's Energy Planning <br />and Management Program <br />E1S? <br /> <br />In seeking to replace some or all of the power lost from GCD, the SLCA <br />will consider obligations under existing long-term contractual commit- <br />ments, existing purchase power authority, and the requirements of the <br />Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992. <br /> <br />In 1989, the SLCA entered into long-term, firm electric service contracts <br />to furnish wholesale power to eligible preference customers. These <br />contracts committed the SLCA to provide specified amounts of power to <br />its customers through September 2004. To provide some degree of <br />resource certainty to these customers, contracts were written so that the <br />customers could rely on the resource for the contract terrn. <br /> <br />when hydroelectric power resources are reduced, the SLCA must pur- <br />chase supplemental resources to meet its contractual commitments. <br />Federal law, as interpreted by the courts, provides the SLCA the necessary <br />authority to purchase power in amounts necessary to "firm up" the <br />Federal hydroelectric resource. <br /> <br />Additionally, in Section 1809 of the GCP Act of 1992, Congress directed <br />the Secretary of Energy to examine methods to replace power lost from <br />Glen Canyon because of changes in its operation. In so doing, Congress <br />recognized the necessity of the Federal government to satisfy its contrac- <br />tual obligations. <br /> <br />Also, the SLCA understands that most of the smaller firm power custom- <br />ers may not have the administrative capability to identify and evaluate <br />replacement options and may have contractual limits on access to the <br />electrical market. Many customers believe that the SLCA would be best <br />situated to economically replace the lost capacity due to the Federal <br />transmission system and economies of scale. <br /> <br />Finally, the SLCA perceives a need to improve the value of the power it <br />markets to the extent practicable. The addition of replacement resources <br />may result in a more valuable electric power resource for the SLCA <br />customers. <br /> <br /> <br />The Department of the Interior will make a final decision on the opera- <br />tion of GCD and make it available to the public in 1995. The implemen- <br />tation of this decision is predicated on requirements specified in the <br />Grand Canyon Protection Act. Changes in the operation of this dam are <br />expected to reduce its ability to follow variations in hourly, daily, weekly, <br />and seasonal electrical load. The upcoming decision on GCD will define <br />the amount of Glen Canyon electrical resource made available to the <br />SLCA. <br /> <br />The 5LCNIP Electric Power Marketing EIS examines alternative commit- <br />ment levels of electrical power which the SLCA could offer its customers <br />under long-term contracts. The SLCA's present resources to meet these <br />commitment levels include powerplants at Glen Canyon; Flaming Gorge; <br />the Aspinall Units; the Collbran, Seedskadee, and Rio Grande Projects; <br />and purchases from regional electric power generators. The combination <br />of the SLCA's commitment level decision and Reclamation's Glen Canyon <br />decision will define the SLCA's near-term electrical power shortage - the <br />amount of additional electrical power the SLCA will need to meet its <br />contractual obligations through September 2004. <br />