Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br /> <br />U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br />FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION <br />IUIEAU OF PUBLIC lOADS <br />lEGION NINE <br />Colorado Division <br />Room l18A, Building 40 <br />Denver Federal Center <br />Denver, Colorado 80225 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />October 6, 1971 <br /> <br />09-05.3 IN REPLY REFER TO: <br /> <br />eX. p" r,. Burnett, Chief, Engineering Division <br />Department of the Army <br />Omaha District, Corps of Engineers <br />7410 V. S. Post Office and Court House <br />Omaha, l;ebraska 68102 <br /> <br />Dear ;,lr. Burnett: <br /> <br />'Thank you very much for affording us the opportunity to revie\/ ana <br />corl1T,lcnt upon your draft envirorunental staten'ent for tl::e Lear Creek <br />Vam and Lake, Colorado. He would appreciate it very ",uch if you <br />~ould place this office on your mailing list for any of your projects <br />havinG an effect upon Colorado highways. <br /> <br />lie note that the last paragraph, pa~e 6 and .\ppendix I Plate ~ inr.\i- <br />cate .'the relocation of ?i:orrison ?oad (US !liehHay 285) II. If you are <br />tnll~inr. about currently numbered State lIir,'.l'.my 8 flre~-;er:.tJ '/ located <br />in Eear r::rce1~ valley it uill require re.location.: SlwulJ. YOIl h'2 cli.c:;- <br />cus3JnE currently n~mber-US-285 (relocated Hampden l,venue c,'ectc.rl" <br />Ul) Turkc:.' ~rc:=.k canyon) it should n~~ have to DC r~loc.:!.t2.:1 sir!c(~ its <br />y'resc.nt loc.ation ~.'a3 coordinated "'lith your ;:l:oject. I~: li:ht of t:-,(~ <br />.J.bove CO::rr.l8!ltS perhaps it '\:-.'ould be apprOflriate to update Plate 2 to <br />;:;;~.O\': the. correct State hir;h;;'lay n~bers .J.ud to inrlicate t~IRt T!S ~35 <br />iw.s already llcen relocated to accotnr!1.ouate your floo~l control p16oject. <br /> <br />'.i'~le first par.:!.::;rapl:., pac~ 7 indicates that proposed Interstate 470 loca- <br />tion l.near the ~'lestern edge of the project is nap quite fin:.~'. FI"!.til <br />s'-1ch time as our m.m environmental problems concerning thi~, route arc <br />resolved none of the proposed location5 can be considered as lrfirm;;. T11~ <br />noise pollution mentioned in this same paragraph can he lllininizec! by <br />probJer location and. cles:L~n of our facility pith respect to yours. ":\.ir <br />pollution IJill be reduced by technological advances in llesien of internal <br />coniliustion engines as required by the Air Pollution Control Act. <br /> <br />J::.'{cept for the above cOI!lInents we consider your draft statement to be <br />adequate. <br /> <br />Sincerely :our~ <br /> <br />>).. ;; - C.U..HI- <br /> <br />A'../G.. AbelarJ 0 <br />Division Engineer <br /> <br />#" <br />