My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01569
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
2/4/1972
Author
USACOE
Title
Final Environmental Statement for Bear Creek Flood Control Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />its assimilative capacity vhen it is impounded because the total distance <br />for the stream to reaerate vill have been shortened. It should also be <br />noted, however, that even though the atmospheric reaeration rate in <br />impoUDiments is low the amount of oxygen transferred through impoundments <br />m~ be substantial beca.use of the large surface area. This could result in <br />a greater assimilative capacity. <br /> <br />CODment: If vater quality problems occur because of the <br />impoundment of the stream, can the Corps of Engineers undertake remedial <br />measures such as upgrading of sevage treatment systems to a higher degree <br />of treatment to assure that vater quality vill be suitable for intended <br />purposes? <br /> <br />Response: The Corps has no jurisdiction over activity <br />outside project boundary and as such vould have no control over vater <br />quality problems generated outside the project area. <br /> <br />Comment: Will a seasonal pool be provided? <br /> <br />Response: A multiple-purpose pool vill be <br />maintained at constant elevation with no plans for providing s seasonal <br />drawdown. Any seasonal fluctuations will be due to precipitation runoff <br />and these vill be rapidly drawn down through discharge from the <br />outlet vorks. <br /> <br />Comment: Will there be a minimum release and, if so, how <br />vill this release be accomplished? <br /> <br />Response: The reservoir operation plan calls for releasing <br />inflow up to a selected discharge magnitude predicated on the pool level <br />in the reservoir. The minimum release from the reservoir will, therefore, <br />be the same as the minimum inflow into the reservoir, minus evaporation. <br />Data indicates thst there should be no problem in maintaining a minimum <br />flow since low inflows are significantly greater than maximum evaporation <br />losses, The outlet structure vill be capable of meeting the following <br />opera.ting criteria: <br /> <br />Release Rate (c.f.s.) <br /> <br />Pool Conditions <br /> <br />From top of conservation pool <br />to half-full flood control pool <br /> <br />Inflow to maximum rate <br />of 500 c.r.s. <br /> <br />From ha1f~full flood control pool to <br />75 percent full flood control pool <br /> <br />1,000 <br /> <br />From 75 percent full flve' '~ntrol <br />pool to full flood control pv~ <br /> <br />1,500 <br /> <br />From full flood co'.. ',h _ ~ol <br />to emergency ep',,_lVSlf crest <br /> <br />2,000 <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.