WSP01564

• File Number: 8273.600
• Description: Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - USDA
• Basin: Colorado Mainstem
• Water Division: 5
• Date: 1/1/1991
• Title: Colorado SCS Salinity Projects - Part 1 of 3 - General info and The Grand Valley Project
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

TA8LE 1
f~~' GRAND VALLEV SALINITV PROJECT
IRRIGATION MONITORING SITES, 1985-1991'
Site Irrig.1I Soil 21 Monitored Sites, 8y Vear Vears Fully
0 No. Svst. Tvoe '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 Mon i tored
0 10 COP Fruita cl x x x OR NH 31
(J\ 11/39* PGP/PGS Genola cl x x x x x x x 7
...:& 12 CDS Ravola fsl x x x x x x DR 6
13 PGS Fruita cl x x DR NH 41 51 x 3
14 PGP Youngston fsl x x x x x DR NH 5
15/41* CDS/CGS Ravola cl x x x x x x x 7
16 CDS Billings siel x x x x x x x ' 7
17 HIS Genola cl x x x x x x x 7
18 PGS Hesa cl x x x x x x x 7
19 SRS Hanksvi lie siel x x x DR NH 3
20 CDP Ravola I x x DR NH NH 2
21 PGP Ravola fsl x x x x x x x 7
22 EDF Fruita cl DR NH NH NH ' 1
23 CDS Avalon fsl x x DR NH NH 2
24 CDS Billings sicl x x x DR NH 3
25 CDS Fruita cl x DR NH NH NH 1
26/51* PGP/PGS Ravola fsl x x x x x x ' 6
27 PGP Fruita cl x x x x x 5
28 HIS Hesa c I x x x DR NH 3
29/48** CDS Billingssicl x x x x DR 4
~-~"
....:;:;~;r 30 CDS Hanksvi I Ie sicl X x x x 4
:t:'r~~~ . X
~,:'.-:.-:.'1 31 CDS Hanksvi lie sicl 5/ NH 2
x x x
32142** CDS Hanksvi lie siel x x x x 3
33 SRS Hanksville sicl x x x x 3
34 SRS Fruita cl GI NH 0
35 SRS Hanksville siel x x DR 2
36 SRS Hanksville sicl x x x 'x 3
37 CDS Hanksvi lie sicl x x x x 3
43/44* PGP/PGS Fruita cl x x 1
45/46* COP/PCS Hanksvi lie sicl x x' I
47 PGP Hesa cl x x 2
49/50* COG/CGS Hanksvi lie siel x 1
Total 16 16 16 18 19 25 23
Irrigation Syste.Types II So i I Texture 21
EDf--Earth Ditch to Feeder Ditch CDS--Conc. Ditch to Siphon Tubes cl--Clay Loam
CBG--Cablegation M1S--Microspray fsl--Fine Sandy Loam
SRS--Sideroll sprinkler CDP--Ported Concrete Ditch sicl-Silty Clay Loam
PGP--Pipeline to Gated Pipe CDG--Concrete Ditch to Gated Pipe I-Loa.
31 Site not monitored after being dropped
4/ Site reactivated after being dropped, a ful I season of data not obtained due to equip.ent
malfunction
5/ Site partially monitored in 1987: fully monitored in 1989 and 1990
61 Site partially monitored and then dropped
* Surge and conventional sites set up in two different areas of the same field for comparison
of surge and conventional irrigation, In previous years, sites 11/39 and 15/41 monitored as
one site each. Site 41 has concrele dilch to gated pipe, surge instead of CDS
7