My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01545
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:34 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/11/1979
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 79-3 Meeting - December 11-12 1979
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />no effect on the threatened and endangered fi sh. In-stream. flow <br />requirements were discussed with State and Federal members of the <br />Committee and a Justice Department attorney. It was generally agreed <br />that in-stream flow requirements could be determined for a particular <br />species of fish at certain times of the year, and the methodology was <br />refined enough to be credible. It was not agreed that the "Federal <br />reservation doctrine" was paramount or superseded state water laws. <br />This is merely a continuation of the Federal-state rights battle. <br />Essentially, the states still feel that the water belongs to the states <br />and should be managed by them, and the Federal government feels the <br />water is the property of the Federal government. <br /> <br />At the Jackson meeting the Subcommittee met with Bridger National Forest <br />representatives and discussed the impact of energy development on <br />recreational resources. The Forest Service puts rather stringent regu- <br />lations concerning access, road construction, revegetation, water use, <br />transmission lines and all other pertinent facilities necessary for <br />mining operation before issuing a special use permit. Generally, <br />compromises are reached and, although satisfactory to neither the Forest <br />Service nor the mining companies, not to mention the environmental <br />groups, are accomplished. Mining operations can be carried out in such <br />a manner that damage is not irreparable and mitigation is assured. <br /> <br />The 1980 work program of the Recreation and Environmental Subcommittee <br />will be interpretation of the Water Resources Council Principles and <br />Standards as pertaining to environmental and recreational planning <br />issues. Those items' of major concern are included as Part C-6 of <br />attachments. The work program was accepted by the parent committee. <br /> <br />8. Consortium Of Water Institutes and Centers (CWIC) <br /> <br />Professor Sol D. Resnick, Director, Water Resources Research Center, <br />Uni vers i ty of Ari zona, Tucson, Ari zona, presented the report of the <br />CWIC. The report is in Part C-7 of attachments. <br /> <br />9.. Highlights from Members <br /> <br />Written semiannual reports were presented anq are included in Part C-8 <br />of attachments. <br /> <br />Highlights from members were as follows: <br /> <br />Laren D. Morrill, Colorado, announced that the Grand Valley Bill (House <br />5199, Senate 2117) is "in the hopper" but being held up because of <br />mitigation and lateral lining legislation. <br /> <br />Ro1 and Raetz, Department of. Commerce, reported there are agreements in <br />the Attorney General's office for Arizona state and Federal organizations' <br />cooperation toward streamlining interagency network weather forecasting <br />and flood warning systems. <br /> <br />B-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.