My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01537
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:18:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ,CO,NV,NM,UT,WY
Title
Arizona Water Protection Fund - Meetings/Newletters - Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to a Surplus, Normal, and shortage Year Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2.) Overruns may not exceed 7% of annual entitlement. <br />3.) Overruns must be repaid the following year by the entity that benefitted from the <br />extra water unless the following year's operation is controlled by the flood control <br />regulation and water must be released beyond downstream demands. <br /> <br />vn. Control of Illel!:al Diversions and Uses <br /> <br />The implementation of interim reservoir operating criteria cannot stand alone in the water <br /> <br />management of the Lower Colorado River. The Six States' concern about California' s <br /> <br /> <br />continuing use of Colorado River water above its basic apportionment is an indicator that they <br /> <br />believe that the era of limits in the Lower Basin has begun. In order to implement and enforce <br /> <br /> <br />these limits so that other states or individual water entitlement holders are not adversely impacted. <br /> <br />the Bureau of Reclamation must move forward with its identification of <br /> <br /> <br />Lower Basin water users who are either exceeding contract entitlements or are diverting water <br /> <br /> <br />without a contract. The Bureau must take steps necessary to require more accurate measurement <br /> <br />and reporting of diversions. It must also develop accurate techniques for determining both <br /> <br />measured and unmeasured return flows to the river. The issues of withdrawal of Colorado River <br /> <br />water from wells must be dealt with either by adopting a modified version of the "bright line" <br /> <br />approach currently being considered by the Bureau or by some other scientifically and legally <br /> <br /> <br />valid approach. The Bureau must consult with the affected states and water users before <br /> <br />proposing any final regulation. but it should establish a schedule and process to undertake this <br /> <br /> <br />necessary step. <br /> <br />VITI. Conclusion <br />The Governor's representatives of the States of Arizona. Colorado, Nevada. New <br />Mexico, Utah and Wyoming have stated on numerous occasions their desire to work with <br />representatives of California to develop and implement a plan that will. over time, eliminate <br />California's dependence on Colorado River water above its 4.4 mafbasic apportionment. One <br />critical component of that plan is the implementation of interim Lake Mead reservoir operating <br />criteria that will provide California M&I entities greater security of supply through the Colorado <br /> <br />I3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.