My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01537
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:18:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ,CO,NV,NM,UT,WY
Title
Arizona Water Protection Fund - Meetings/Newletters - Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to a Surplus, Normal, and shortage Year Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GOU309 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />a much more limited extent. If reservoir conditions continue to deteriorate, additional cuts in use <br />by CAP will be required. <br /> <br />VI. Overrun Accountine <br /> <br />The Draft California 4.4 Plan includes a provision that allows individual entitlement <br /> <br /> <br />holders to exceed their yearly apportionment. The proposed overrun would be constrained by a <br /> <br /> <br />maximum allowable accrual and would be subject to repayment in subsequent years. The overrun <br /> <br />.accounting provision is tied to the administration of agricultural entitlements. <br /> <br />The Six States are concerned with the overrun provisions. First. as the Colorado River <br /> <br />enters into an era of limits. the States expect the Bureau of Reclamation to strictly enforce its <br /> <br />contracts and the entitlements. In essence. within the Lower Basin. the Bureau must play the role <br /> <br />of the State Engineer and enforce current limits on diversions by water users. Secondly. the Six <br /> <br /> <br />States are leery of proposals that would allow significant diversions above the amount of water <br /> <br />allowed to a state in shonage. normal. or limited surplus years according to the proposal <br /> <br />described in this paper. It would be extremely inequitable to allow California agricultural districts <br /> <br />to overrun their diversions by 10%, which is over 300.000 acre feet, while at the same time ca1ling <br /> <br />for the Central Arizona Project to reduce diversions by 500.000 acre feet because a shonage had <br /> <br />been declared. <br /> <br />. In spite of these significant concerns. the Six States do recognize that there may be limited <br /> <br />occasions when inadvertent overruns will occur. Due to the fact that the annual entitlement of a <br /> <br /> <br />junior priority district is dependent on the actual use by a senior priority user. there may be <br /> <br />occasions when a district will order water only to find out later that it had exceeded its contract <br /> <br />entitlement. Ibis matter is funher compounded in the Lower Basin because a state's <br /> <br />apponionment is for consumptive use rather than diversions. Until the books are reconciled to <br /> <br /> <br />calculate diversions less measured and unmeasured return flows. it may not be possible to know <br /> <br />whether or not an overrun has occurred until the after-the-fact accounting is completed. <br /> <br /> <br />The Six States propose that a limited form of overrun accounting be instituted. It must be <br /> <br />based on the following principles: <br /> <br />1.) Overruns must be inadvertent. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.