Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0352 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />in the Hardin valley flood pool area there is no school system; <br />students are already enrolled in a school system not itself in <br />the flood pool. The first part of the analyses generally in- <br />volved what would happen in the flood pool areas per se in light <br />of existing services, facilities, attitudes, etc. The second <br />~art of this analysis in turn entailed examining each of the <br />five other geographic areas to determine what if any impacts <br />were likely. As an illustration, the develpoment of recreation <br />activities in connection with the reservoir at either site <br />would affect consumers in different ways depending upon where <br />they lived. The Narrows site is within a one to two hour <br />commuting time via 80S from Denver; it is also viewed very <br />favorably by local residents for their own use. Hardin. though <br />somewhat closer to Denver, is presently less accessible because <br /> <br /> <br />of the less developed highway network in the vicinity. A <br /> <br /> <br />Hardin site reservoir would be therefore less easily visited <br /> <br /> <br />both by Denverites and by residents of the Brush and Sterling <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />area. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />In summary, pooling the data from all sources available <br />for each of the modules, forecasts were developed for 23 separate <br /> <br />considerations under seven topic areas, according to types of <br /> <br />impacts associated with each alternative and geographic area of <br />impact. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Once all three scenarios had been considered, a final <br /> <br />section entitled Summary and Conclusion was completed. The <br />analysis here was. in part, a matter of judgment. Based upon <br /> <br />the materials collected and analyzed. the research staff made <br /> <br />41 <br />