Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a <br />...04 <br />C"j <br />....<1 <br />(.-~ <br /> <br />c; <br /> <br />To meet the project's critical objective of competitive product <br />transport in the pipeline system, liquid carbon dioxide (C02) <br />is proposed as a transport medium. The naturally occurring <br />chemical compound has a greater carrying capacity than water <br />in a conventional slurry pipeline, allowing more sources and <br />markets to be served. The liquid CO, will also protect the <br />quality of the coal (or the product made from the coal) during <br />transport. The potential liquid CO2 transport of other commodities <br />such as soda ash, grain, and clay products is proposed to <br />make optimal use of the system, but laboratory and pilot plant <br />testing will be needed. <br /> <br />Through a Cooperative Agreement, the U.S. Department of the <br />Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and Aquatrain, Inc. (a company <br />representing private industry) are jointly investigating the <br />project's concept. <br /> <br />The foremost purpose for government participation in AQUATRAIN <br />is to develop an alternative for reducing salinity in the <br />Colorado River at the lowest cost and, where possible, for <br />beneficially using the water. <br /> <br />The foremost interest of Aquatrain, Inc., is to attain an economically <br />competitive, long-tenl method of transporting coal from coal- <br />rich regions of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah to domestic markets <br />in the southwest U.S. and possibly export markets. <br /> <br />Additional benefits could result from achieving these objectives. <br />AQUATRAIN would minimize the cost of energy produced from <br />new coal-fired electric utility powerplants by making low- <br />cost, high-quality coal and/or coal products readily available <br />and by beneficially using saline water rather than freshwater <br />to cool powerplants. AQUATRAIN would also help reduce the <br />amount of oil and gas currently being burned in powerplants, <br />conserving it for other, more beneficial uses. For example, <br />the AQUATRAIN Project, at 30 million tons of coal annually, <br />could replace the equivalent of about 120 million barrels <br />of petroleum-based fuels now being burned to produce 60 billion <br />kilowatt-hours of electricity. Freeing up that petroleum <br />resource through use of coal in coal-fired powerplants would <br />be cheaper than building new synthetic oil plants, resulting <br />in further savings to utilities, consumers, and the Nation. <br /> <br />A portion of the savings in commodity transport revenues would <br />be used to support AQUATRAIN's transportation of saline water. <br />Private industry would bear project construction costs and, <br />if necessary for project financial integrity, the Federal <br />government's salinity control program would pay a negotiated <br />share of operation and maintenance costs. The cost of the <br />entire pipeline system is estimated at $2-3 billion (constant <br />1982 dollars). <br /> <br />2 <br />