Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ro <br />j <br /> <br />.......1 <br /> <br />Appendix 1. <br /> <br />RELATED TECHNOLOGIES <br /> <br />(. <br /> <br />'--: <br /> <br />A number of technologies relating to saline water and coal <br />use are currently being developed. The possibilities offered <br />by these new techniques may enhance the AQUATRAIN Project <br />further, leading to additional benefits and cost savings. <br /> <br />Increasing demand for freshwater has made use of saline water <br />more desirable for industrial purposes, such as cooling. <br />Also, regulations requiring zero discharge from powerp1ants <br />have prompted development of economical methods to concentrate <br />cooling water to a small percentage of its original volume. <br />Cooling towers, using saline water delivered by the AQUATRAIN <br />pipeline system, promise to meet both of these objectives. <br />In a powerp1ant cooling tower, a primary cooling loop would <br />contain freshwater while a secondary cooling loop would contain <br />saline water (Figure 5). The loops would be separated by <br />thin plastic sheets to prevent mixing. Heat from the freshwater <br />would be transferred to the saline water, which would become <br />more concentrated through .evaporation. Resultant wastewater <br />of 120,000 milligrams per liter salt concentration would be <br />disposed in evaporation ponds or dry lakes. <br /> <br />Deep cleaning techniques for coal (also called washing or benefi- <br />ciation) might be employed in the process of crushing coal <br />for liquid CO? transport in the .pipe1ine . system to eliminate <br />contaminants ~nd produce a high-grade coal product. The <br />results could be higher heat content of the coal, substantially <br />lower costs for emission control equipment, and reduced shipping <br />costs for domestic and export markets. Private industry and <br />government-sponsored projects are developing methods to remove <br />all or part of coal contaminants, such as moisture, ash, and <br />sulfur. The coal product which would result from cleaning <br />might be burned in existing powerp1ants now using expensive <br />oil and gas, or could be burned in present or planned coa1- <br />fired powerp1ants as clean, efficient fuel. <br /> <br />Another possibility is the mixing of finely ground coal with <br />either water or oil to produce a fuel for oi1- arid gas-fired <br />powerp1ants. These mixtures, which would have near homogeneous <br />properties, could reduce boiler slagging and fouling and could <br />subsequently improve air quality. <br /> <br />Coal that has not been cleaned could fuel powerp1ants without <br />increasing pollution through fluidized-bed combustion. Several <br />fluidized-bed designs are now available or under development <br />for burning any grade of unwashed, crushed coal. In general, <br />all fluidized-bed combustors generate steam from coal via <br />a heat exchanger. In a fluidized-bed system (Figure 6), a <br />mix of crushed coal and limestone (or dolomite) is constantly <br />agitated from below by pressurized airjets. The mix responds <br />in the manner of a boiling liquid, heBce the term "fluidized". <br />The ignited mix burns at 1500 to 1700 F -- one-half the temperature <br /> <br />33 <br />