Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Memo to Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />From Peter Evans and E.I.Jencsok <br />December 5, 1995 <br />Re: Endangered Fish Instream Flow Water Rights, "15 Mile Reach," Colo. River <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Notice reflects comments received at and prior to the October 20, 1995 special meeting and the <br />November 7, 1995 regular Board meeting. With distribution of the Final Notice, the Board has <br />complied with the public notice process. <br /> <br />FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The amounts of water being recommended by the Service on a monthly basis for instream <br />flow water rights are provided below. These amounts reflect the Service's recommendations <br />from the May 1995 report. :p~ f'b<W0 ~ <br /> <br />U.s. Fish and Wildlife Service Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Rate Exceed. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aue Sep Oct Nov Dee <br />25% 25% 1630 1630 1630 3210 10720 15660 1060 1630 1630 1630 1630 1630 <br />25% 50% 1630 1630 1630 2440 9380 14250 5370 1630 1630 1630 1630 1630 <br />30% 80% 1630 1630 1630 2260 7710 11350 3150 1240 1240 1240 1630 1630 <br />20% 100% 1240 1240 1240 1860 7260 6850 1480 810 810 810 1240 1240 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PHYSICAL WATER AVAILABILITY <br />To evaluate the physical availability of water in the 15 Mile Reach, various studies were <br />conducted by consultants and the Board staff. <br />Physical Water Availability Studies: In 1994 Leonard Rice Consulting Water <br />Engineers (LRCWE) completed a Physical Water Availability Study for the Board. Seven major <br />river basins within Colorado were studied: Gunnison, Yampa, Little Snake, White, Dolores, <br />Colorado mainstem and the San Juan. The purpose of the study was to quantify the amount of <br />water, in volume and rate of flow, for sections of rivers in the Upper Colorado River Basin which <br />have or will have endangered fish flow recommendations. The LRCWE study did the following: <br />~ Evaluated the study period of 1970-1992 to detennine if it was representative of <br />the complete period of record. <br />~ Reviewed USGS gaging station records for their appropriateness in characterizing <br />the streamflows within stream reaches of interest. <br />~ Statistically generated gage records to fill incomplete gage records from the study <br />period. <br />~ Adjusted gage records to account for'major changes of water use in the basins <br />during the study period ( The purpose of these adjustments was to bring gage <br />station records during the period to an estimated 1992 level of depletion). <br />~ Presented statistical gage and adjusted gage record results in tabular and graphical <br />formats on an annual, monthly, and daily basis. <br />