WSP01413 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PAONIA E,ROJEC';f, COLORADO 7\ $1,266,000 in a 40-year repayment period in excess of costs for opera- tion and maintenance. Of the total cost, an allocation of $32,000 is reasonably made to flood control and is nonreimbursable. An indeterminate amount, not expected to exceed $300,000, will be col- lected from sale or rental of the reserve storage capacity in Spring Creek Reservoir as future need for this capacity develops. Any remaining balance of construction costs is appropriately allocable to those benefits of a public nature previously discussed and is not con- sidered repayable by the water users under reclamation laws. PARTICIPATION BY OTHER AGENCIES 23. The Paonia project plan has been reviewed by other Federal agencies having an interest in development and conservation of national resources. Although other agencies are in general accord with the plan of development, their interests are not sufficiently affected to justify their direct participation in the project. . 24. The Fish and Wildlife Service recognizes that the net Qffect of the project on fish and wildlife, although small, will be favorable. Irrigation of 2,000 acres of new land and a supplemental water supply for 12,750 acres now under irrigation should result in a somewhat improved environment for upland game birds.. Reduction in flood flows and other stream regulation resulting from operation of the Spring Creek Reservoir should result in some improvement to the stream habitat for fish and birds. 25. Only a small amount of federally owned grazing land, adminis- tered by the Grazing Service, will be directly involved in the develop- ment. Oonsummation of the project will undoubtedly be beneficial to the range livestock industry and will effect a better land use in the area. In view of the general benefits to be obtained from the project, the Grazing Service is in accord with the plan of development. . 26. The National Park Service has no existing or proposed units- of the National Park system in the project area,- and no development for recrllational use of the Spring Oreek Reservoir appears to this agency to be warranted. ' 27. The Geological Survey has supplied basic streamflow data used in the planning of the project and recognizes the needs for its various stream-gaging stations maintained in the area. 28. Mining and minerals will be little affected by the project devel- opment. There are no national forest or Indian lands in the project area. The Army engineers made flood~control studies for the Spring Creek Reservoir, but flood-control benefits will be small and incidental compared to the reservoir costs and irrigation benefits. CONCLUSIONS 29. The revised plan for development of the Paonia project as out- lined herein is economically sound. Its measurable benefits alone exceed its estimated costs by more than2~ to 1. In addition there are many tangible benefits not appraised in terms of economic dollar returns to the Nation, but which are nevertheless equally real. The plan has engineering feasibility as evidenced by results of the engineer- ing studies, surveys, designs, and estimates. Local and State officials desire the project as planned and water users have voiced a willing- ness to repay the amount herein reported as being within their ability ,