My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01381
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01381
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:45 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:22:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.300
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Colorado River Consumptive Uses and Losses Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/2/1989
Title
Hydrologic Determination 1988 - Water Availability from Navajo Reservoir and the Upper Colorado River Basin for Use in NM
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~ Additional analyses were made at the request of the Upper Basin states <br />minimum reI eases set at 7.5 MAF annually. The difference between relea <br />can be translated directly into increased yield to the Upper Basin. Mas <br />balance analyses similar to those described above were made using both <br />20.197 MAF of storage ("empty" at top of inactive pools') and 23.141 MAF <br />("empty" at bottom of inactive pools). The firm yields for the basin (n <br />shortages) were calculated at 6.28 MAF and 6.40 MAF respectively. Figur <br />5 and 6 show the relationships between yield, shortages and probabilitie <br />As indicated in the earlier examples, these should be considered <br />approximate relationships. <br /> <br />, <br /> 0 <br /> t:') <br />'~1 ,..., <br />dl ~ <br />! " <br />:J .-. <br />'1 <br />~:l <br />'.( <br />'J <br />.1 <br />.1 <br />:~ <br />! <br />~ <br />; <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />B. Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />Table 2 shows a .summary of the results of this investigation. <br /> <br />Study <br />1967 study <br /> <br />Hydrology <br />Virgin Flow <br /> <br />Current Studies <br />Maintain <br />Min. Pools <br /> <br />CRSS Nat'l <br />CRSS Nat'1 <br /> <br />Use <br />Min. Pools CRSS Nat'l <br />CRSS Nat'l <br />1/ Yield has approximately a <br />about a 6% shortage. <br /> <br />TABLE 2 <br /> <br />Summary Results <br /> <br />Storage <br />(MAF) <br />26.232 <br /> <br />Min. <br />Release <br />(MAF) <br />8.25 <br /> <br />Without <br />Shortages <br />(MAF) <br />5.45 <br /> <br />Yield <br />With Tolerable <br />Shortages II <br />(MAF) <br />5.80 <br /> <br />20.197 8.23 5.55 6.00 <br />20.197 7.5 6.28 6.77 <br />23.141 8.23 5.67 6.09 <br />23.141 7.50 6.40 6.88 <br />98.5% probability of being sustained with <br /> <br />Use of the eRSS hydrology data base and system storage availability as <br />determined from the use of CRSS indicate that the Upper Basin firm yield, <br />without acceptable shortages, is about 100,000 acre-feet greater than was <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.