|
<br />.
<br />
<br />Item
<br />
<br />Total project costs
<br />Repayable interest during
<br />Total project investment
<br />
<br />constt!uction
<br />
<br />Less nonreimbursable allocations
<br />Flood control
<br />National wildlife enhancement
<br />Road relocation-PL 87-874
<br />Local fish and wildlife enhancement:
<br />One-half separable costs
<br />Joint costs
<br />Recreation development
<br />One-half separable costs
<br />Initial development
<br />Future facilities
<br />Joint costs
<br />
<br />Balance reimbursable
<br />
<br />Reimbursable allocations
<br />Financed .or repaid with interest:
<br />Local fish and wildlife enhancement:
<br />One-half separable costs
<br />Interest during construction
<br />Recreation
<br />One-half separable costs:
<br />Initial development
<br />Future facilities
<br />Interest during construction
<br />
<br />Repaid without interest:
<br />Irrigation
<br />
<br />Total reimbursable
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Table 43.--Payout Analyses, Senate Resolution 148
<br />
<br />Separable
<br />cost-
<br />remaining
<br />benef'i t
<br />rethcxi
<br />
<br />$61,820.000
<br />51. ,00
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />18,958,EDo
<br />952,500
<br />139,000
<br />3,264,100
<br />(569,500)
<br />(2,694,EDO)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />9,246,400
<br />
<br />28,018,000
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500)
<br />1,317,EDO
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />26,104,500
<br />28,018,000
<br />
<br />100-year analysis
<br />
<br />Priority
<br />of
<br />
<br />use
<br />me thod
<br />
<br />$61,820,000
<br />51. 100
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />26,582,300
<br />1,215,800
<br />139,000
<br />5,579,300
<br />(569,500)
<br />(5,009,800)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />17,197,EDo
<br />
<br />9,864,EDo
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500)
<br />1,317 ,EDo
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />7,951,100
<br />
<br />9,864,EDo
<br />
<br />Increment-
<br />al cost
<br />method
<br />
<br />$61,820,000
<br />51.,00
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />10,388,000
<br />643,EDo
<br />139,000
<br />569,500
<br />(569,500)
<br />(0)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(0)
<br />
<br />48,838,500
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500)
<br />1,317,EDo
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />46,925,000
<br />48,838,500
<br />
<br />Se}:erable
<br />cost -
<br />remaining
<br />benefi t
<br />methcxi
<br />
<br />.$61,820,000
<br />51. 100
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />18,469,400
<br />901,000
<br />139,000
<br />3,354,200
<br />(569,500)
<br />(2,784,700)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />8,396,900
<br />
<br />29,318,100
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500)
<br />1,317,EDo
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />27,404,EDo
<br />29,318,100
<br />
<br />50-year analysis
<br />
<br />Priority
<br />pf
<br />use
<br />method
<br />
<br />.$61,820,000
<br />51. 100
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />21,981,800
<br />1,008,500
<br />139,000
<br />4,524,700
<br />(569,500)
<br />(3,955,200)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />ll,917,500
<br />
<br />21,007 ,100
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500 )
<br />1,317,EDO
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />19,093,EDo
<br />21,007,100
<br />
<br />Increment-
<br />al cost
<br />method
<br />
<br />,$61,820,000
<br />01. 100
<br />61,871,300
<br />
<br />10,388,000
<br />643,EDO
<br />139,000
<br />569,500
<br />(569,500)
<br />(0)
<br />
<br />1,292,700
<br />(722,700)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(0)
<br />
<br />48,838,500
<br />
<br />595,900
<br />(569,400)
<br />(26,500)
<br />1,317,600
<br />
<br />(722,800)
<br />(570,000)
<br />(24,800)
<br />
<br />46,925,000
<br />48,838,500
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.....,
<br />0')
<br />
<br />.1
<br />I~r-.
<br />,.~
<br />
|