My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01337
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8051
Description
Area of Origin
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/1/1985
Title
Addressing the Area of Origin Problem - A Research Report Prepared for the Colorado Water Resource Research Institute
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Of course, the law itself does not require construction of <br /> <br /> <br />compensa tory storage. It only requ i res that present appropr i a- <br /> <br /> <br />tion and prospective consumptive uses of water not be "impaired <br /> <br /> <br />nor increased in cost at the expense of the water users within <br /> <br /> <br />the said natural.basin."92 The provision then refers to the <br /> <br /> <br />facilities "and other means" that will be utilized to accomplish <br /> <br /> <br />this purpose. When the Bureau of Reclamation was building such <br /> <br /> <br />projects it may have made sense to satisfy this requirement <br /> <br /> <br />through compensatory storage. Now, however, it is time to <br /> <br /> <br />consider some alternative approaches. <br /> <br /> <br />The requirement that present appropriations of water not be <br /> <br /> <br />impaired or increased in cost can be addressed through mitigation <br /> <br /> <br />measures determined by engineering and hydrologic studies of <br /> <br /> <br />project effects. As the Windy Gap example has shown, potentially <br /> <br /> <br />impacted interests are likely to come forward to seek protec- <br /> <br /> <br />tion. In that case, mitigation measures were agreed to through a <br /> <br /> <br />negotiation process. <br /> <br /> <br />The protection to be accorded to prospective consumptive use <br /> <br /> <br />of .water is more problematic. Such prospective uses are inher- <br /> <br /> <br />ently speculative. It is difficult to know now how to insure <br /> <br /> <br />that such unknown uses will not be impaired or. increased in <br /> <br /> <br />.cost. Compensa tory storage does add ress thi s concern but a t a <br /> <br /> <br />cost that may no longer be acceptable. Rather than committing <br /> <br /> <br />limited resources to such projects it may make more sense to <br /> <br />Issues and options, October 9, 1985 at 9. <br /> <br /> <br />92Colo. Rev. Stat. 837-45-118(b) (IV) (1973). <br /> <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.