My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01337
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8051
Description
Area of Origin
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/1/1985
Title
Addressing the Area of Origin Problem - A Research Report Prepared for the Colorado Water Resource Research Institute
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />because there was federal funding available to build the entire <br /> <br />transbasin diversion project including the additional storage. <br /> <br />As discussed, the bargaining position of the West Slope was <br /> <br />exceptionally strong because of the position of its congressional <br /> <br />representatives. <br /> <br />As a result, <br /> <br />two maj or <br /> <br />I <br />storage projects have <br /> <br />been built without cost to the West Slope. At the same time, the <br /> <br />East Slope conservancy districts gained access to exceedingly low <br /> <br />cost federal funding and construction support. <br /> <br />It was a deal no <br /> <br />one could turn down. <br /> <br />Seen in this 1 ight, it is clear why the Colorado law is <br /> <br />aimed only at conservancy districts. <br /> <br />These entities were <br /> <br />authorized specifically to be able to tap into federal reclama- <br /> <br />tion funding. <br /> <br />Federal largess enabled the additional cost <br /> <br />r epr esen ted by compensa tory storage to be ,more easi ly absorbed <br /> <br />into project costs. <br /> <br />Since the City of Denver was financing its <br /> <br />projects wi thout federal support it was excl uded from hav ing to <br /> <br />provide compensatory storage. <br /> <br />With major federal financing for water storage pr1ljects no <br /> <br />longer available it is time to reevaluate the compensatory <br /> <br />storage concept. <br /> <br />Such projects are expensive to build. <br /> <br />There <br /> <br />are few remaining sites that are both technically desirable and <br /> <br />environmentally and politically acceptable. <br /> <br />Apparently little <br /> <br />demand has yet developed for the storage already constructed.91 <br /> <br />9lIn 1984 Exxon obtained the first long-term service <br />contract from the Bureau of Reclamation for 7,200 acre-feet of <br />water from Ruedi Reservoir to be used in connection with its <br />Colony oil Shale project. porzak," Innovative Transfer and <br />Exchange Plans," Paper presented at Conference on Colorado Water <br /> <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.