Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C\t <br />,00 <br />C\l <br /> <br />~- <br /> <br />Reference Number <br /> <br />~,- <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6, <br /> <br />7, <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />ll. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />LISTING OF CONCERNS <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />Concern for interbastn transfer in 10 years, (and that the possibility should <br />not be quickly dismissed.) <br /> <br />R) Legislation prevents such study. River augmentation would only work <br />in the unlikely event that imported water were not used. <br /> <br />R.O. product water to local ~unicipalities (should be considered.) <br /> <br />R) This idea is being pursued. <br /> <br />Some springs should be open to rafters. <br /> <br />R) <br /> <br />for not caput ring GIO, G20, and GIOO would be $1.4 <br />Some type of open flow use scheme will be studied <br /> <br />Damages sustained <br />million annually. <br />however. <br /> <br />Ruedi water cannot be used to replace Dotsero water (if Dosero springs are <br />collected. ) <br /> <br />R) Possibility of exchange exists. Water rights appear to be toughest <br />problem so far. <br /> <br />Temporary impacts of construction (should be determ~ned in more detail) <br /> <br />R) To be done for candidate alternatives. <br /> <br />Trucking of salt through Glenwoud Canyon and other areas other than a pipe- <br />line (should be considered.) <br /> <br />R) Will be looked at, but trucking presents some other concerns (traffic, <br />energy costs). <br /> <br />Re-evaluate the salinity control objective it! view of changing conditions <br />downstre<"m. <br /> <br />R) Must look at long-term (20-30 years) impacts and conditions. <br />Temporary changes can be deceiving. <br /> <br />Practical uses of saline water (should be pursued.) <br /> <br />R) Most definitely: Oil shale, coal, utilities, etc., being pursued- <br />but we need help! <br /> <br />Practicality of deep well injection (is questionable in light of uncertainty <br />of geology at depths involved.) <br /> <br />R) Acknowledged! Alternative is evaporation an~/0r stockpile; <br />therefore, Kill continu'2 !o t.=OT!5:i_der as rcrh.'lpS a last resort. <br /> <br />pipeline rou~~s needed - highway right-of-way versus <br />eonstruction and vehicular access is critical to <br />Timing is also critical for heavy equipment in the <br />species, bald eagle wintering, and migration routes. <br /> <br />Definite specifications on <br />riparian lands. Timing of <br />prevent river degradation. <br />river, nesting of non-ga~e <br /> <br />R) Good point for all alternatives. Will be considered in more <br />detail during design. <br /> <br />Placement and construc.tion of evap'lr2tion ponds, their impact on migrat.ing <br />waterfowl, and mitigation costs should b~' incorporated before final public <br />meeting. <br /> <br />R) Mitigation costs are new included. Hare detailed 'tolork to be done <br />however. <br /> <br />Impacts of waler withdrawal on threatenc.d ar:.d endangered species, specifically: <br /> <br />a) timing of withdraw'al. augmC'l".tation "'<'Iter, and how it would. be released <br />into the system <br /> <br />b) temperature c1langes .....hich tlould be critical for spawnine periods <br /> <br />R) Generally the 20 cfs of wi thdrawal is fiat expected to create any <br />problems even ~.".hcn the river is at a low flow (9IG cfs), 'tolbieh was <br />recorded in 1977. <br /> <br />Mark <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />2 <br />