My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:40 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:14:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.500.20.A
Description
Colorado River Operations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/15/1986
Author
UCRC
Title
Draft - Upper Colorado River Commission Action Related to Operation of the Colorado River Reservoir System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of Lake Powell and Lake Mead and was not intended to modify the Long-Range <br /> <br />Operating Criteria. The document, which reviewed annual operation plans for <br /> <br />Lakes Powell and Mead, included specific limits on the operation of these <br /> <br />Lakes to provide spawning habitat for the bass fishery in Lake Mead. The <br /> <br />States of New Mexico, Wyoming, and California protested language that would <br /> <br />make maintenance of fishery habitats in Lakes Powell and Mead anything but <br /> <br />incidental to the operation of the reservoir system. <br /> <br />At a special meeting on January 10, 1978, the Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />Commission passed a resolution that objected to the Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />releasing water from Lake Powell to enhance bass production in Lake Mead. <br /> <br />This resolution concluded: <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission. . . that said Commission strongly objects to the <br />resumption of the practice of releasing water from Lake Powell for <br />the enhancement of bass production in Lake Mead for the reasons <br />that such releases are not in compliance with the law, . . <br /> <br />On February 3, 1977, the Commission's General Counsel Paul Billhymer <br /> <br />wrote a memo to Executive Director Ival V. Goslin regarding power contracts <br /> <br />entered into by the Bureau of Reclamation that put the Bureau in the position <br /> <br />of possibly having to release flows greater than 8.23 million acre-feet to <br /> <br />generate enough energy to meet the contracts. The central question addressed <br /> <br />by Mr. Billhymer was whether or not the Secretary of the Interior had <br /> <br />authority to release water in excess of 8.23 million acre-feet from Lake <br /> <br />Powell. After outlining the requirements of section 602(a) of P.L. 90-537 <br /> <br />and discussing the legislative history of that section, Mr. Billhymer con- <br /> <br />eluded: <br /> <br />From the above outlined legislative history it should be clear <br />that Congress understood that in the operation of Lake Powell, it <br />was setting up strict guidelines which were to be followed. The <br />guidelines did not allow the Secretary to establish an unfettered <br />operating criteria. It further seems clear from the Secretary's <br /> <br />1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.