Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TARGET REMOVAL GOALS <br /> <br />.- <br />~,.; <br /> <br />~ Salinity control targets are evaluated and updated every three years by <br />aD Reclamation in cooperation with the basin states and reported in the Salinity <br />Forum's report titled "Triennial Review of the Water Quality Standards for <br />Salinity, Colorado River System." The targets are used to evaluate the <br />effectiveness of plans to control salinity and maintain the salinity <br />standards. The rate of program implementation then'is adjusted to match the <br />projected need. <br /> <br />Table 1 summarizes the projected salt load reduction targets, subtracts <br />completed projects through 1995, and projects the amount of funding needed to <br />implement the balance of additional salinity control needed. The table <br />assumes that salinity control can be implemented at an average rate of $50 per <br />ton, beyond 1995. As can be seen by the results of the analysis, annual <br />expenditures for the entire salinity program needs to be maintained at about <br />$22.5 million per year for the next 5 yeare to maintain the standards through <br />the year 2000. This funding will potentially come through the BLM, <br />Reclamation, and the Department of Agriculture programs. <br /> <br />Table 1.-- Basinwide Salinity Reduction Targets and Funding Requirements to <br />Maintain the Water Quality Standards for the Colorado River -- combine Goals <br />and Funding Requirements for BLM, BOR, and USDA programs. <br /> <br /> Total Annual <br /> Reduction Expenditure <br /> Target Completed Balance Needed to <br />Year (tons) (tons) (tons) Meet Targets <br />1990 180,000 183,500 -3,500 $39,375,000 <br />1995 519,000 517,000 2,000 $42,375,000 <br />2000 697,000 517,000 180,000 $22,500,000 <br />2005 843,000 517,000 326,000 $20,375,000 <br />2010 1,104,000 517,000 587,000 $24,458,333 <br /> " <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1990 and 1995 expend~ture needs" used cost effect~veness of $70 per ton <br />2000 through 2010 cost effectiveness assumed to improve to $50 per ton <br /> <br />20 <br />