Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Line 42. Replace "of' with "to". <br /> <br />Line 62, footnote 1. Replace ", maintenance of existing Navajo Dam and Reservoir authorized <br />purposes, and additional" with "and in proceeding with". <br /> <br />Line 63. Replace"." with "or a reasonable alternative." The Fish and Wildlife Service has indicated <br />that the Flow Recommendations criteria are not necessarily inviolate. <br /> <br />Lines 63-64. Replace "Reclamation would maintain the authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit <br />while enabling future water development to proceed in the Basin" with "The Navajo Unit would <br />continue to provide for further water development in the San Juan River Basin consistent with its <br />authorized purposes and." The sentence as written appears to incorrectly relegate the development <br />and use of compact apportionments to something other than an authorized purpose of the Navajo <br />Unit, or to an additional or secondary purpose. <br /> <br />Line 65. Insert "Supreme Court" preceding "decrees". <br /> <br />Line 99. Delete "(hydrograph)". <br /> <br />Line 101. Replace "together" with "in concert". <br /> <br />Line] 02. Replace "beneficial hydrologic conditions for the" with "hydrologic conditions beneficial <br />to endangered". <br /> <br />Line 120. Replace "depletions" with "depletion for the Project". <br /> <br />Line 121. Insert "a total" following "that". <br /> <br />Line 152. Replace "under" with "recommended by". <br /> <br />Line 153. Replace "propagation" with "augmentation". <br /> <br />Line 159. Delete the third "the". <br /> <br />Lines 166-168. Replace the three lines with: "the Flow Recommendations to be met and water <br />development to proceed consistent with the ESA and other applicable laws. Additional depletion in <br />the Basin is". The State of New Mexico disagrees with the baseline depletion amounts used in the <br />1991 Biological Opinion and those used in the current hydrologic modeling. Descriptions of uses <br />under the baseline must be qualified as to correct breakdowns of depletions among the indicated <br />projects or uses, as to the methodologies used to estimate the depletions, and as to the amounts of <br />depletions on streamflow at a specified location vcrsus at the place of use. The depletions used in <br />. <br />the 1991 Biological Opinion are not distributed correctly among water uses and include depletions <br />at the site of use which exceed the corresponding dcpletion of San Juan River streamflow from Four <br />Corners downstream due to salvage by use. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />00751 <br />