Laserfiche WebLink
<br />or. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />','I. <br /> <br />",'\. <br />. ., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />M[\u8<J <br /> <br />. '. .. <br /> <br />SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW <br />OF <br />EXISTING GUNNISON BASIN MODEL <br /> <br />lNTRODUcnON <br /> <br />ll1is document is a summary description and critical review of the eXJsling basm model. It is <br />based on the executive summary and excerpts from Task Memorandum No. , of the Colorado Water <br />Resources and power Development Authority's Phase 1 Study, on public comments received in the scap. <br />iog of the current planning model development project, and 'on Hydrosphere's own technical review of <br />the model. A diagram of the model network and tables listing important data and information support- <br />ing the summary are anached at the back ofthis document. <br /> <br />MODEUNG APP.ROAQI <br /> <br />The basin model was developed using a network modeling system and runs on IBM-compa(ible <br />microcomputers. in the model, the basin is characterized as a network of links represeming inflows, <br />sneam reaches, diversions, reservoirs, and demands. The priorities placed on various links In the <br />network are derived from water nghts considerations. These priorities control the allocation of water to <br />various uses represemed in the model. Operating rules for various facilities are implemented through <br />special computer code which adjusts the priorities assigned to specific links, such as those which <br />represent reservoir storage or relc;l.Ses. <br /> <br />The model operates on a monthly time step over a 1952-83 study period. In each month, [he <br />model solves for an opumal allocation of available water supplies according to the priorities placed on <br />various links by the user. Reservoir carryover storage and lagged return nows are the connections be- <br />tween one month's solurion and the next. A diagram of the model network is attached to the back of <br />this docUI:nenl. <br /> <br />STIJDY PERIOD IIYDROLOGY <br /> <br />lnDows <br /> <br />Files of model inflows at 59 sites were derived by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) staff in <br />Grand Junction. These inflows are of threc. typcs, 1) vjrgin flows, 2) gaged flows, and 3) imputed ,each <br />gains. Virgin flows at gaged sires were derived from historical flow records corrected for upstream reser- <br />voir operations. basin imports and exportS, and irrigation depletions. Historical irrigation depletions <br />were estimated from consumptive use rates derived from the CRSS database, a.crea.ges obtained from the <br />USBR. the SCS, and the Gunnison CounlY assessor, and from detailed operaling studies of selected <br />ditches. Virgin flows at ungaged siles were developed [rom virgm flows at "reference gages" corn=-crcd <br />for area and elev~llion differences; Table 1 li':;,lS lhcse reference gages. <br /> <br />Gag~d OOVolS Wt.:TC lIsed 1O rcprcst:11I inflows from the North and SmHh Forks of the Gunnison <br />and the inllows to R.id~way Reservoir. !teach ~ains imputed from gaged flows were used lo rcprcscnl ac- <br />cretions along the Uncompahgre I{JVtr above the SOLlth Canal and along the Gunnison below Della. <br />