Laserfiche WebLink
<br />cO <br />i'" <br />\,-- <br />'. - <br /> <br />C'J <br /> <br />" ._~ <br /> <br />(:..:' <br /> <br />LIST OF TABLES <br /> <br />Table <br /> <br />p.... <br /> <br />1 Summary of the evaluation of multiobjective solution techniques <br />(AfterCohonandMarks,1973)................................................. .8 <br /> <br />2 Noninferior multiobjective solution techniques. ...................................9 <br />3 General inventory of streamflow data. ..........................................20 <br /> <br />4 Partial listing of probable Dows- Virgin River Basin (based on <br />'Best-Fit' frequency distribution selected from 10 different <br />types and 5 different plotting position equations-computertized <br /> <br />approach). ................................................................. .21 <br /> <br />5 Summary of normal climatological data for Iron, Kane, and <br />Washington counties (From Bagley et al., 1959) .................................23 <br /> <br />6 Area devoted to particular land use in the Virgin River Basin <br />in Utah (1970)... .. . . ..... . .. . ... . ... ... . .... . ... . .. . ........ ... .. .. ... ..... . .25 <br /> <br />7 Employment by sector in Washington County, Utah (1970). .......................25 <br /> <br />8 Employment by sector in Nevada portion of the Virgin River <br />Basin (1970). ............................................................... .25 <br /> <br />9 Farm sales by gross sales class in Washington County for 1969. ....................26 <br /> <br />10 Rural and nonfarm employment in 1969 in the Virgin River Basin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 <br /> <br />11 Employment by industry in St. George for 1970. ................................ .26 <br /> <br />12 Reputational hierarchy in the Upper Virgin River Basin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 <br /> <br />13 Reputational hierarchy in the Mesquite, etc., subsection of the <br />Lower Virgin River Basin. ....................................................28 <br /> <br />14 Reputational hierarchy in the Overton-Logandale subsection of <br />the Virgin River Basin. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . ... ... .. .. ... . . .. . .. .. .. .28 <br /> <br />15 "Most Helpful" and "Least Helpful" water management <br />organizations in the Upper Virgin River Basin.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 <br /> <br />16 "Most Helpful" and "Least Helpful" water management organiza- <br />tions in the Lower Virgin River Basin (subsections combined). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 <br /> <br />17 Hydrologic and climatologic data stations used in this study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 <br /> <br />18 Available water quality data. ................................................. .35 <br /> <br /> <br />19 Parameters for interfacing BSAMS with allocation model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 <br /> <br />20 Optimum acreage distributions from the allocation model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 <br /> <br />21 ActivityleveIsfortheannualavailabilitymodel..................................50 <br /> <br /> <br />22 Changes in agricultural production for increased availability of <br /> <br />late season water.. . ... ... . .. ... . . .. . ..... ... . . ... . .... . .. ... . ....... ... ......53 <br /> <br />xl <br />