Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'.1 <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />"I' <br />" <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />("':) <br /> <br />t- <br />t(' <br />C'l <br /> <br />,~" <br />--- <br />~_.. <br /> <br />LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />Table <br /> <br />p.... <br /> <br />23 Trade offs between recrestion use and agricultural production <br />(late season). . _ _ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . _ . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . - . . . . . .63 <br /> <br />24 Trade offs between agricultural production and M and I using prices <br />parBIDeterization(lateseason)........_. ._... .... ......- ...... ..... .-..-..... ..63 <br /> <br />25 Results from the annual average water quality model interface (late season) . . . . . . . . . 63 <br /> <br /> <br />26 Interest groupsand values. ........ _..... . ... . ... . . _. ... . .. ... . _. .. ... .... ... .57 <br /> <br />'l:1 Environmental factors and conditions for the Virgin River <br />Basin: Impactmatrix.... _ _........ _.. _ _. _. _............. _............ _... _...58 <br /> <br />28 Environmental states for the VirginRiverBasin........ _ _............... _.. _. _.. .59 <br /> <br /> <br />29 Course ofaetion outcome (CAO) matrix for the Virgin River Basin. ......... . . _ . . . _ .60 <br /> <br /> <br />30 Systemic politieaI feasibility indices for alternative Virgin River <br /> <br />Basin plans. '............. _ _.:............. _. _........... _. _... _............ .61 <br /> <br />31 Data input procedures. . .. . .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. . . _ . . . _ . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . _ . .. .. .. . .68 <br /> <br />32 Group values matrix and group salience. . _ . . _ . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . .69 <br />33 Group power. "'''''''''''''''''' _.. _.. _.............. _................... _.70 <br /> <br />34 Group affect. ................. _....................................... _..... .70 <br /> <br />35 Group dogmatism.................................... _ _..................... .70 <br /> <br />36 Group cost consciousness.. . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _70 <br /> <br />37 Environmentalfactors.... _................ _.................... _. _ _. _........71 <br /> <br />38 Factor-value impact matrix. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ . . . . . . . . . . .72 <br /> <br />39 Master list of activities for course of action selection. .............................73 <br /> <br />40 Course of aetion defined for the Virgin River Basin.. ................. _........... .78 <br /> <br />41 Course ofaction outcome matrix. _......................... _ . . .. .. .. .. . .. . _ . _ .79 <br /> <br />42 Course ofaction costlevels (CL).... _............................... _ _......... .80 <br /> <br />43 Comparison of desired value vector with environmental state value <br />vector. .................... _. . . _. .. . . _.. ... . .. . . _. _. . . _. .. ... .. .. . _... .. .. ._86 <br /> <br />44 Comparison of desired value vector with environmental state value <br />vector. ....... _ . . _ . . _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . , . . . . .86 <br /> <br />45 Systemic politieaI feasibility indices for alternative Virgin River <br />Basin plans. .. . _. . . _. .. . . .. . .. . . ... . _. . . _. . . _. . . .. ... . . .. .. . _. . .. ... .. .. .. . . .87 <br /> <br />xii <br /> <br />- <br />