Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />September 21, 1921 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />September 24--29, 1921 <br /> <br />September 25-26,1921 <br /> <br />September 29, 1921 <br />September 30,1921 <br /> <br />October 1,1921 <br /> <br />June 7, 1922 <br /> <br /> <br />Dugway Gage was permanently installed and consisted of a vertical low-water section from <br />Oft to 9.5 ft, inclined middle section from 8 ft to 21 ft, and a high-water section from 21 ft to <br />28 ft. Elevation of the peak of the June 1921 flood was found to be 26,5 ft on this new gage <br />(fig, B2). First stage measurement made at 6:25 p,m, The datum of the Dugway Gage was <br />3,106.16 ft above the NGVDI929. <br /> <br />New Number 4 Gage was permanently installed. This gage replaced the old temporary <br />Number 4 Gage on the large rock in the channel and the inclined Number 3 Gage on the left <br />banle This gage consisted of a vertical low-water section attached to the large rock in the <br />channel near the left bank below the Upper Cableway, and five higher-elevation inclined <br />sections on the left bank. Vertical section read from 3 ft to 15 ft, and inclined sections read <br />from 12.5 ft to 33.5 ft (fig. B3). Elevation of the road on the left bank was at a stage of 27 ft. <br />Photographs indicate that, at the Number 4 Gage, this road was just above the elevation of <br />the peak stage of the June 1921 flood, The datum of the Number 4 Gage was 3,106,82 ft <br />above the NGVD 1929. <br /> <br />Number 1 Gage was permanently installed and consisted of a velticallow-water section <br />from 10,15 ft to 13.55 ft and an inclined higher-water section that extended from 13.5 ft to <br />23 ft. Low-water section was located about 117 ft downstream from the inclined section <br />(fig. B4), Elevation of the peak of the June 1921 flood was found to be 30,89 ft on the <br />Number I Gage. The datum of the Number I Gage was 3,102,60ft above the NGVDI929. <br /> <br />Old temporary Number 4 Gage on rock was removed. <br /> <br />The USGS computed daily mean discharge through this date from the stages measured at the <br />Number 1 Gage. Because of uncertainties in how the stages measured on the LaRue Gage <br />related to those measured on the Number 1 Gage, no daily mean discharges were published <br />by the USGS prior to June 13, 1921. <br /> <br />The USGS computed daily mean discharge after this date from the stages measured at the <br />Dugway Gage. <br /> <br />LG, Cockroft and Elmer Johnson measured the elevation of two high-water marks from the <br />June 1921 flood at the Lonely Dell Ranch, The first of these marks was "about 8 inches <br />above the ground on post offence near bottom wire" and was shown to Cockcroti and Elmer <br />Johnson by JetTy Johnson, The con'ected NGVD 1929 elevation of this high-water mark was <br />3,132,64 ft, which equals 26.48 ft above the datum of the Dugway Gage. This high-water <br />mark was only 0.02 ft lower than that measured on the left bank at the Dugway Gage. The <br />second of these high-water marks was at the high-water edge of the alfalfa field near the <br />fence and road, 1bis high-water mark was traced to be within 50 ft of the original gage on <br />the Pmia River (this gage was one meander upstream. about 1,970 ft, from the CUlTent Pmia <br />River gage). The high-water mmk consisted of small pieces of drift and grass, The corrected <br />NGVD1929 elevation of this high-water mark was 3,132,61 ft, which equals 26.45 ft above <br />the datum of the Dugway Gage. This mmk was only 0,05 ft lower than that measured at the <br />Dugway Gage. These high-water marks were located between 0.6 and 1.2 miles diagonally <br />downstream on the light bank of the Colorado River, and up the Pmia River valley. In a <br />streamwise coordinate system, these mmks would be located about 0,3 miles downstream <br />from the Dugway Gage, Therefore, the slope of the water surface in the reach immediately <br />below the Dugway Gage was approximately 0,00001 to 0.00003 during the peak of the 1921 <br />flood, <br /> <br />Cl22H; <br /> <br />Appendix B 71 <br />