|
<br />~
<br />
<br />September 21, 1921
<br />
<br />~
<br />~
<br />
<br />September 24--29, 1921
<br />
<br />September 25-26,1921
<br />
<br />September 29, 1921
<br />September 30,1921
<br />
<br />October 1,1921
<br />
<br />June 7, 1922
<br />
<br />
<br />Dugway Gage was permanently installed and consisted of a vertical low-water section from
<br />Oft to 9.5 ft, inclined middle section from 8 ft to 21 ft, and a high-water section from 21 ft to
<br />28 ft. Elevation of the peak of the June 1921 flood was found to be 26,5 ft on this new gage
<br />(fig, B2). First stage measurement made at 6:25 p,m, The datum of the Dugway Gage was
<br />3,106.16 ft above the NGVDI929.
<br />
<br />New Number 4 Gage was permanently installed. This gage replaced the old temporary
<br />Number 4 Gage on the large rock in the channel and the inclined Number 3 Gage on the left
<br />banle This gage consisted of a vertical low-water section attached to the large rock in the
<br />channel near the left bank below the Upper Cableway, and five higher-elevation inclined
<br />sections on the left bank. Vertical section read from 3 ft to 15 ft, and inclined sections read
<br />from 12.5 ft to 33.5 ft (fig. B3). Elevation of the road on the left bank was at a stage of 27 ft.
<br />Photographs indicate that, at the Number 4 Gage, this road was just above the elevation of
<br />the peak stage of the June 1921 flood, The datum of the Number 4 Gage was 3,106,82 ft
<br />above the NGVD 1929.
<br />
<br />Number 1 Gage was permanently installed and consisted of a velticallow-water section
<br />from 10,15 ft to 13.55 ft and an inclined higher-water section that extended from 13.5 ft to
<br />23 ft. Low-water section was located about 117 ft downstream from the inclined section
<br />(fig. B4), Elevation of the peak of the June 1921 flood was found to be 30,89 ft on the
<br />Number I Gage. The datum of the Number I Gage was 3,102,60ft above the NGVDI929.
<br />
<br />Old temporary Number 4 Gage on rock was removed.
<br />
<br />The USGS computed daily mean discharge through this date from the stages measured at the
<br />Number 1 Gage. Because of uncertainties in how the stages measured on the LaRue Gage
<br />related to those measured on the Number 1 Gage, no daily mean discharges were published
<br />by the USGS prior to June 13, 1921.
<br />
<br />The USGS computed daily mean discharge after this date from the stages measured at the
<br />Dugway Gage.
<br />
<br />LG, Cockroft and Elmer Johnson measured the elevation of two high-water marks from the
<br />June 1921 flood at the Lonely Dell Ranch, The first of these marks was "about 8 inches
<br />above the ground on post offence near bottom wire" and was shown to Cockcroti and Elmer
<br />Johnson by JetTy Johnson, The con'ected NGVD 1929 elevation of this high-water mark was
<br />3,132,64 ft, which equals 26.48 ft above the datum of the Dugway Gage. This high-water
<br />mark was only 0.02 ft lower than that measured on the left bank at the Dugway Gage. The
<br />second of these high-water marks was at the high-water edge of the alfalfa field near the
<br />fence and road, 1bis high-water mark was traced to be within 50 ft of the original gage on
<br />the Pmia River (this gage was one meander upstream. about 1,970 ft, from the CUlTent Pmia
<br />River gage). The high-water mmk consisted of small pieces of drift and grass, The corrected
<br />NGVD1929 elevation of this high-water mark was 3,132,61 ft, which equals 26.45 ft above
<br />the datum of the Dugway Gage. This mmk was only 0,05 ft lower than that measured at the
<br />Dugway Gage. These high-water marks were located between 0.6 and 1.2 miles diagonally
<br />downstream on the light bank of the Colorado River, and up the Pmia River valley. In a
<br />streamwise coordinate system, these mmks would be located about 0,3 miles downstream
<br />from the Dugway Gage, Therefore, the slope of the water surface in the reach immediately
<br />below the Dugway Gage was approximately 0,00001 to 0.00003 during the peak of the 1921
<br />flood,
<br />
<br />Cl22H;
<br />
<br />Appendix B 71
<br />
|