Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for "municipal purposes" is accomplished through <br />sales to municipal utilities. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Utah Power and L 19ht also points to a contractual <br />arrangement it recently executed with the <br />Bonneville Power ;Admi ni strati on (BPA) as embodying <br />the same considerations of fairness and equity <br />that should apply to the sale of CRSP power. <br />According to UP&L. the contract requires BPA to <br />purchase. at UP&L's average cost of service, a <br />volume of electric power equal to that consumed by <br />IJP&L's res i dent i a 1 consumers in the State of <br />Idaho. BPA apparently is then required to resell <br />an equivalent am()unt of power, at a rate equal to <br />BPA's average system cost, to UP&L. The savi ngs <br />would then be passed on to residential consumers <br />in Idaho. <br /> <br />Any considerations of fairness and equity inherent <br />in the contrattVal arrangement described above are <br />a result of the ,passage of the Pacific Northwest <br />Electric Power Pl anni ng and Conservation Act of <br />1980. 16 U.S.C. section 839 et. seq. That piece <br />of legislation ~powers BPA to engage in many <br />activities whic~ Western currently lacks statutory <br />authority to emulate, including the execution of <br />such a purchase and sale contract. More relevant <br /> <br />46 <br />