Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Dee-31-l001 09:54~ Frar- <br /> <br />T-183 P.D04/DD4 F-41T <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Page m-I89, LiDe 5615 <br />Add at end of sentence: in the existing flood control criteria for the operation of Navajo <br />Dam. However, the Corps, by letter dated December 6, 2001, notified Reclamation that <br />the CUlTent safe channel capacity for the San Juan River immediately below Navajo Dam <br />is 5,000 CIS. . <br /> <br />Page iII-190, LiDe 5641 <br />Change: "6,000" to "16,000" <br /> <br />Page m-190, Lille 5642 <br /> <br />Change: "considering "'],""g;T1g !his to 5,000 cIS." to "planni'1g to revise this criteria. to <br />reflect the =t river conditions." <br /> <br />Add: By letter to Reclamation, dated December 6, 2001, the Corps has detemrined that <br />the current safe clwmel capacity is 5,000 CIS. <br /> <br />Suggest you expand this discussion to :reflect the limits on the release capability from the <br />dam so the reader understands how we got to 5,000 cis. <br /> <br />Biological Assessment, Page 8, Flow Recommendations <br />At some point in the discussion, it lIlleds to be made clear at what point on the San Juan <br />River the flow recommendatiollS apply to. (i. e. Fanninsron, Shiprock) <br /> <br />01067 <br />