Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nr;j'~d"1 ~ 7. <br />u.. f.s........ <br /> <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />were used. Partial records were completed by correlation with <br /> <br />nearby stations for periods of concurrent records or otherwise <br /> <br />estimated as explained below. The stream flow records reflect <br />any increase in depletions that may have occured during the <br />study period because of expansion of irrigated acreage. No, <br /> <br />corrections for this increased use have been made because the <br /> <br />location, amount and time of occurrence of these increased de- <br /> <br />pletions are not definitely known. Modified flows at certain <br />stations under conditions of partial or full potential upstream <br />development are tabulated with the project discussion in later <br />articles of this report. There follows a detailed account of <br />the method of obtaining the historical flow at stations on the <br />San Juan River for the period 1934-1954. <br />1. Navajo River at Edith. Colorado. <br />The record of discharge for this station has been published <br />from June, 1934 to the end of the study period of this report, <br />September, 1954. For the months October through May of Water <br />Year (WY) 1933-34, ~the discharge was estimated on the basis of <br /> <br />nearby records and historical flows for these months. <br />2. San Juan River at Rosa, New Mexico. <br />Discharge records for this station have been published for <br />the entire study period. This station represents the flow of <br />the river at the Colorado - New Mexico state line. <br /> <br />3.. San Juan River near Blanco, New Mexico. <br /> <br /> <br />The discharge record for this station has been published for <br /> <br /> <br />the entire period of study. This station records the inflow to <br /> <br />the Navajo Reservoir. <br /> <br />,,.. <br /> <br />.<-. <br /> <br />.'" ~(,,.~}i <br />