<br />SUMMARY SHEETS (Continued)
<br />
<br />Cost-effectiveness como_risen with other salinity control unitall
<br />
<br />CQm~leted!'
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage One Development
<br />Meekst;' , Domell
<br />P laoned!/
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two Development
<br />Price Ditch laterals
<br />Ea.-c' end portion, Government Hlghllne Canal
<br />East end portion, Government H1ghline
<br />Ganal laterals
<br />West end portion, Government H1ghline
<br />Canal laterals.-
<br />Grand Valley Canal laterals~/
<br />KiddIe portion, GoV'ernaent HighUne Canal
<br />laterala
<br />Kiefer Extension laterals
<br />Weat end portion, Coverument Kighline Canal
<br />Grand Valley Hlghltne Canal laterals
<br />Middle portiOn, Go~rament Kighline Canal
<br />Grand Valley K81nl1.ne Canal laterals
<br />Orchard He.. Canal No. 1 lateral_
<br />Independent Rancbm.n1a Ditch laterala
<br />Orchard Me.. Canal No. 2 laurals
<br />Stub Ditcb lateral,
<br />Total
<br />Lower Gunnlson Basln
<br />Wiater water replaee..nt
<br />Canal ayn...
<br />East
<br />Sel1g
<br />South
<br />Gamet
<br />Lout.enhlzer
<br />Total
<br />Uinta Baaln Unit
<br />Zi...raan Wash sub.rea
<br />Pl....nt Valley sub.rea
<br />Gr.y Kountain subarea
<br />Pahe..se subarea
<br />Sou tb Pork Dry Gulch subarea
<br />Purdy-Kidview .ubarea
<br />Total
<br />Dolors. Project
<br />Upper Hemana 1
<br />Lone Pine 1 and 2
<br />Lone Pine 4, 5, and 6
<br />Lone Pine 10, 11, and 12
<br />Towaoc Canal and Rocky Ford Laterals
<br />Rocky Pord Lateral south of Aztec Divide
<br />Total
<br />1 Baaed on current planning intereat rate
<br />except aa noted.
<br />Z/ AS-CoDstructed costs.
<br />~/ Based on a 100-year project life.
<br />4/ Baaed on Janua~ 1987 price level.
<br />S/ Includea the Keaa County Ditch laterals.
<br />b/ Adjusted to aceount for the increase resulting from wildlife
<br />salt load reduction could range from 21,000 to 30,000 tous per year.
<br />
<br />Unit
<br />
<br />S-10
<br />
<br />Total
<br />annual
<br />coat.a
<br />
<br />$2,571,000
<br />261,060
<br />
<br />1,172,000
<br />2,361,000
<br />
<br />634,000
<br />
<br />1,998,000
<br />874,000
<br />
<br />3,044,000
<br />529,000
<br />924,000
<br />1,028,000
<br />3,991,000
<br />1,523,000
<br />885,000
<br />324,000
<br />359,000
<br />523.000
<br />20,169,000
<br />
<br />3,134,000
<br />
<br />2,484,000
<br />3,181,000
<br />4,139,000
<br />1,008,000
<br />1.869.000
<br />15,821,000
<br />
<br />229,500
<br />465,100
<br />852,600
<br />87,800
<br />534,600
<br />346,400
<br />2,516,000
<br />
<br />36,400
<br />179,100
<br />122,500
<br />149,700
<br />1,278,300
<br />272,800
<br />2 038,800
<br />of 8 3 8 percent.
<br />
<br /> Coat
<br />Average effect.1veneaa
<br />salt. load ($/tou)
<br />reduction Iocre- Cumula-
<br />(ton.hear) m~ntal tive
<br />21,900 117 117
<br />19,300 14 14
<br />"
<br />15,800 74 74
<br />. 24,3Q(l 97 88
<br />,6,400 99 90
<br />20,000 100" 93
<br />7,200 121 ~ 96
<br />23,300 131 104
<br />3,400 156 106
<br />5,600 165 109
<br />5,600 184 113
<br />15,300 261 130
<br />5,700 267 136
<br />3,100 285 140
<br />1,100 295 141
<br />1,200 299 142
<br />1,500 349 145
<br />139,500
<br />74,000 42 42
<br />14,900 167 63
<br />J1,..800 179 83
<br />20,800 199 102
<br />4,900 206 105
<br />7,900 237 113
<br />140,300
<br />3,400 68 68
<br />6,400 73 71
<br />9,000 95 82
<br />900 98 83
<br />3,700 144 93
<br />2,100 165 99
<br />2/2.:>>,)00
<br />
<br />33
<br />44
<br />81
<br />81
<br />97
<br />102
<br />
<br />33
<br />41
<br />50
<br />57
<br />81
<br />83
<br />
<br />and a
<br />
<br />1,130
<br />4,100
<br />1,520
<br />1.1850
<br />13,200
<br />2.670
<br />24 470
<br />5G-year project life,
<br />
<br />mitigation.
<br />
<br />Actual total
<br />
|