Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY SHEETS (Continued) <br /> <br />Cost-effectiveness como_risen with other salinity control unitall <br /> <br />CQm~leted!' <br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage One Development <br />Meekst;' , Domell <br />P laoned!/ <br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two Development <br />Price Ditch laterals <br />Ea.-c' end portion, Government Hlghllne Canal <br />East end portion, Government H1ghline <br />Ganal laterals <br />West end portion, Government H1ghline <br />Canal laterals.- <br />Grand Valley Canal laterals~/ <br />KiddIe portion, GoV'ernaent HighUne Canal <br />laterala <br />Kiefer Extension laterals <br />Weat end portion, Coverument Kighline Canal <br />Grand Valley Hlghltne Canal laterals <br />Middle portiOn, Go~rament Kighline Canal <br />Grand Valley K81nl1.ne Canal laterals <br />Orchard He.. Canal No. 1 lateral_ <br />Independent Rancbm.n1a Ditch laterala <br />Orchard Me.. Canal No. 2 laurals <br />Stub Ditcb lateral, <br />Total <br />Lower Gunnlson Basln <br />Wiater water replaee..nt <br />Canal ayn... <br />East <br />Sel1g <br />South <br />Gamet <br />Lout.enhlzer <br />Total <br />Uinta Baaln Unit <br />Zi...raan Wash sub.rea <br />Pl....nt Valley sub.rea <br />Gr.y Kountain subarea <br />Pahe..se subarea <br />Sou tb Pork Dry Gulch subarea <br />Purdy-Kidview .ubarea <br />Total <br />Dolors. Project <br />Upper Hemana 1 <br />Lone Pine 1 and 2 <br />Lone Pine 4, 5, and 6 <br />Lone Pine 10, 11, and 12 <br />Towaoc Canal and Rocky Ford Laterals <br />Rocky Pord Lateral south of Aztec Divide <br />Total <br />1 Baaed on current planning intereat rate <br />except aa noted. <br />Z/ AS-CoDstructed costs. <br />~/ Based on a 100-year project life. <br />4/ Baaed on Janua~ 1987 price level. <br />S/ Includea the Keaa County Ditch laterals. <br />b/ Adjusted to aceount for the increase resulting from wildlife <br />salt load reduction could range from 21,000 to 30,000 tous per year. <br /> <br />Unit <br /> <br />S-10 <br /> <br />Total <br />annual <br />coat.a <br /> <br />$2,571,000 <br />261,060 <br /> <br />1,172,000 <br />2,361,000 <br /> <br />634,000 <br /> <br />1,998,000 <br />874,000 <br /> <br />3,044,000 <br />529,000 <br />924,000 <br />1,028,000 <br />3,991,000 <br />1,523,000 <br />885,000 <br />324,000 <br />359,000 <br />523.000 <br />20,169,000 <br /> <br />3,134,000 <br /> <br />2,484,000 <br />3,181,000 <br />4,139,000 <br />1,008,000 <br />1.869.000 <br />15,821,000 <br /> <br />229,500 <br />465,100 <br />852,600 <br />87,800 <br />534,600 <br />346,400 <br />2,516,000 <br /> <br />36,400 <br />179,100 <br />122,500 <br />149,700 <br />1,278,300 <br />272,800 <br />2 038,800 <br />of 8 3 8 percent. <br /> <br /> Coat <br />Average effect.1veneaa <br />salt. load ($/tou) <br />reduction Iocre- Cumula- <br />(ton.hear) m~ntal tive <br />21,900 117 117 <br />19,300 14 14 <br />" <br />15,800 74 74 <br />. 24,3Q(l 97 88 <br />,6,400 99 90 <br />20,000 100" 93 <br />7,200 121 ~ 96 <br />23,300 131 104 <br />3,400 156 106 <br />5,600 165 109 <br />5,600 184 113 <br />15,300 261 130 <br />5,700 267 136 <br />3,100 285 140 <br />1,100 295 141 <br />1,200 299 142 <br />1,500 349 145 <br />139,500 <br />74,000 42 42 <br />14,900 167 63 <br />J1,..800 179 83 <br />20,800 199 102 <br />4,900 206 105 <br />7,900 237 113 <br />140,300 <br />3,400 68 68 <br />6,400 73 71 <br />9,000 95 82 <br />900 98 83 <br />3,700 144 93 <br />2,100 165 99 <br />2/2.:>>,)00 <br /> <br />33 <br />44 <br />81 <br />81 <br />97 <br />102 <br /> <br />33 <br />41 <br />50 <br />57 <br />81 <br />83 <br /> <br />and a <br /> <br />1,130 <br />4,100 <br />1,520 <br />1.1850 <br />13,200 <br />2.670 <br />24 470 <br />5G-year project life, <br /> <br />mitigation. <br /> <br />Actual total <br />