My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00691
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:20 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:52:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8142.700
Description
Trinidad Project - Annual Operating Plans and Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/1/1996
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Review of Operating Principles and Project Operations Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Operating Principles/Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />," C"i,'~." <br />''OJ',) <br /> <br />and Kansas water users. Similar water exchanges in the amount of 8489 acre feet occurred <br /> <br /> <br />during the review period without interference to the District water supply and without increased <br /> <br /> <br />depletions to downstream water users. The equal volume exchange at Trinidad Reservoir and the <br /> <br /> <br />Las Animas gauge is potentially a benefit to Arkansas River water users downstream of John <br /> <br />Martin Reservoir due to the potentially large differences in water conveyance losses in the <br /> <br /> <br />Purgatoire River from Trinidad Reservoir to its mouth and in the Arkansas River from the Las <br /> <br /> <br />Animas gauge to the mouth of the Purgatoire River. The exchange should be modified to account <br /> <br /> <br />for the differences in the conveyance losses to the mouth of the Purgatoire River. <br /> <br /> <br />D. The releases for stockwater did not result in storage in excess of20,000 acre feet on <br /> <br /> <br />anyone day in the Model Storage right in water year 1992 including carryover nor did the <br /> <br /> <br />accumulated storage exceed the single filling limitation of20,000 acre feet per water year in water <br /> <br /> <br />year 1992 under Reclamation's inteI1Jretation of the operating principles. Although the amount of <br /> <br />water released from Trinidad Reservoir for stock water during the review period did not exceed <br /> <br />1500 acre feet in any water year, the stockwater allowance including river gains from Trinidad <br /> <br />Dam to the Trinidad gauge as measured at the Trinidad gauge in accordance with the operating <br /> <br />principles exceeded 1500 acre feet in 1985 (1645 AF) and 1992 (1544 AF) during the review <br /> <br /> <br />period. The stock water allowance for the Hoehne Ditch Company was terminated and <br /> <br />transferred to the District water supply through litigation; therefore, the stockwater allowance <br /> <br />should be reduced to 1200 acre feet measured at the Trinidad gauge. <br /> <br />E. The total acreage irrigated with the District water supply did not exceed 19717 acres <br /> <br />during the review period. A Reclamation survey in 1985 showed 19385 acres being irrigated and <br /> <br /> <br />a District survey conducted in 1994 showed 19395 acres being irrigated. Both surveys showed <br /> <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.