Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.;'l '!" ,"'. 7'~ <br /><) J;-, "J <br /> <br />12-6-91 <br /> <br />SCOPE OF SERVICES <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Subtask 1.3.f: Define Correspondence with Accounting Spreadsheet <br /> <br />Development of the Planning Model will occur in parallel with development of the <br />Accounting Spreadsheet by USBR. The objective of this subtask is (0 assure <br />correspondence between these two pieces of software--there must be logical consistency <br />between the two in terms of water rights administration and project operation assumptions. <br />These issues of correspondence will be identified through the review of the scope and <br />current progress of work on each piece of software and through a joint meeting between <br />the Sponsors Committee, the USBR technical development staff, and the Hydrosphere <br />technical development staff. If necessary, a follow-up meeting will be scheduled to resolve <br />any outstanding issues of inconsistency. Thereafter, periodic checks will be made to <br />identify and resolve any changes in the scope and direction of work on each piece of <br />software. <br /> <br />Subtask 1.3.g: Define Target Computing Environment <br /> <br />The objective of this task is to define the type of computer hardware that will be <br />necessary to effectively use the Planning Model. One consideration in this regard is the <br />types of hardware systems currendy owned by the various members of the Sponsors <br />Committee. Another important consideration relates to the desired operation of the model <br />as discerned during Subtasks 1.3.a through 1.3.f above; it may be that the "lowest common <br />denominator" of existing computer hardware is incapable of supporting many of the types <br />of simulation and user interaction operations that are desired by the Sponsors Committee. <br />The tradeoff then would become one of giving up model functionality to avoid costs of <br />upgrading hardware. The definition of the target computing environment will be <br />accomplished through a survey of existing Sponsors Committee hardware, a survey of <br />current costs for upgrading those systems to varying degrees, and a tradeoff analysis that <br />compares proposed Planning Model functions to the capabilities of various hardware <br />systems. <br /> <br />Subtask 1.3.h: Prioritize Needs <br /> <br />The foregoing subtasks in the needs analysis will have identified a host of desired <br />Planning Model functions and features. The objective of this subtask is to summarize and <br />prioritize those functions and features in light of available project resources and the target <br />computing environment identified in Subtask 1.3.f. This prioritization will involve <br />considerable discussion among the Sponsors Committee with Hydrosphere providing <br />supporting infonnation on development costs and hardware requirements. The result of <br />this task will be the clear definition of the functions and features to be incorporated into <br />the Planning Model. <br />