My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00658
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:10 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:52:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8180.801
Description
Arkansas River-Misc Arkansas Basin Issues and Studies-Setchfield Dam/Muddy Creek Reservoir Study
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/19/1982
Title
DOW Land Trade Environmental Assessment-Environmental Assessment Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />C r- f' ,- g <br />/.... v~... <br />III. Pro~ress: Project development has occurred to the extent that the <br />project area has bsen fenced, posted with Divison signs and <br />patrolled. Water rights were transferred to John Martin Reservoir <br />for fishery purposes and thus, did not remain "idle". Also, grazing <br />privileges were extended to the Dean Land and Cattle Company in <br />exchange for public hunting access on 920 acres of land. Thus, an <br />increase in lands for hunter access was gained by the use of project <br />property. While, not submitted for Federal Aid approval to consti- <br />tute endorsement, the transfer of water rights and lease of project <br />lands are indicative of limited "progress". <br /> <br />In June of 1980 the Commission approved the disposal of the subject <br />property upon the recommendation of the Division as being surplus to <br />Division needs. In July, 1980, the property was advertised for dis- <br />posal by public bid at an appraised value of $144,000. Two bids were <br />received and subsequently rejected. The property was advertised for <br />sale or trade in October, 1980, and three bids were received. On <br />November 20, 1980, the Commission aoproved acceptance of the follow- <br />ing offer of the Dean Land and Cattle Company: <br /> <br />1. The exchange of the deed to project lands for a deed to three <br />separate parcels of land that contain a total of 940 acres; <br /> <br />2. An easement deed to the Division for perpetual hunting and fishing <br />rights on the current project land, and; <br /> <br />3. A 10-year hunting lease on 6,000 acres of Oean's home ranch. <br /> <br />The Dean properties are located within four miles of Las Animas. The <br />total appraised value of the Dean offer, as of October 16, 1980, is <br />$215,900. In contrast, the fair market value of the subject property <br />was established at $144,000, as of October 18, 1979. <br /> <br />Immediately following a review of the subject property, each of the <br />Dean tracts was visited on site to becme familiar with these pro- <br />perties should they become a formal part of a land exchange. Two of <br />the tracts of land that comprise a total of 920 acres are along the <br />Purgatory River and are in close proximity to each other. These pro- <br />perties are the same acres that are a part of the land use exchange <br />involving the grazing of project lands. The Division has undertaken <br />management practices to benefit both fish and wildlife. Small <br />impoundments have been established that are attractive to waterfowl <br />and have fishery benefits. Wildlife food and cover plantings were <br />evident. The area was adequately posted with Division signs attest- <br />ing to public hunting privileges. The remaining 20-acre parcel of <br />land is located immediately north of Las Animas. It contains an <br />earthern berm created by the Division for use as a target range <br />facility. Evidence of such use was readily apparent. <br /> <br />At the time of the review Division personnel were advised that an <br />exchange of properties would involve the establishment of comparable <br />fish and wildlife values in the same ratio (75 percnet D-J and 25 <br />percent P-Rl that the project lands were pruchased, Only the pur- <br />chase values are involved since no development or maintenance has <br />occurred involving Federal Aid funds. Furthermore, Division per- <br />sonnel were advised that the value of the water rights moved from the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.