Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Or;t.':;'7 . <br />t...,Vi- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />APPENDIXES <br /> <br />TRIP REPORT PREPARED BY: JOHN HARDISTER <br /> <br />Carey Dam Fish and Game Management Area (FW-3-L) - Colorado <br /> <br />1. Summary: On January 15, 1981, John Hardister accompanied wilbur <br />Boldt, Bill Olmstead and Jim Young on a field review of the Carey Dam <br />Fish and Game Management Area, project FW-3-L, located about 22 miles <br />south of Las Animas, Bent County, Colorado. The project is also <br />known as the Setchfield Lake property. The purpose of the trip was <br />to ascertain if the property was being used for purposes for which it <br />was acquired. <br /> <br />Observations and conversations with project personnel indicate that <br />project objectives are not wholly being met. Project use for fishery <br />purposes disappeared when the dam broke in 1965 and when water rights <br />acquired as a part of the project were subsequently transferred down- <br />stream to John Martin Reservoir following a determination that repair <br />of the dam would be cost prohibitive in relation to anticipated bene- <br />fits. Project lands retained availablility for some wildlife pro- <br />duction and public hunting. Additional hunting benefits were derived <br />with the lease of project lands for grazing privileges in exchange <br />for public hunting access on 940 acres of land owned by the Dean Land <br />and Cattle Company. These two actions on the part of Divison, trans- <br />fer of water rights and the leasing of project lands, were accomp- <br />lished with out Federal Aid approval. Formal action should be taken <br />to exchange project lands for other properties with commersurate fish <br />and wildlife values and at current land market values. <br /> <br />II. Project Objectives Being Met: The Preliminary Project Statement, <br />approved ~n 1954, states that the project would provide a warmwater <br />fishing lake, winter resting and feeding grounds for migratory water- <br />fowl and controlled hunting of waterfowl and upland game birds and <br />rabbits. Subsequently, between 1957 and 1965 a total of 2,438.03 <br />acres were acquired with Federal Aid funds for a total cost of <br />$40,463.55. Federal Aid funds amounted to a total of $30,347.66 at a <br />ratio of 75 percent D-J and 25 percent P-R participation ($22,760.74 <br />D-J and $7,586.92 P-R). Although variable from year to year, depen- <br />dent upon rainfall and water use, the reservoir generally contained <br />about 1,200 surface acres. <br /> <br />Project values for fishery purposes, amounting to 75 percent of the <br />total project, vanished in 1965 when the dam broke and was never <br />reconstructed. Thus, project objectives for fishery purposes are not <br />being met. With the disappearance of the reservoir, land use fer <br />wildlife production and publiC hunting was affected to the extent <br />that water was not available for waterfowl and waterfowl hunting. <br />Other wildlife values and public hunting not dependent upon the <br />reservoir were not directly affected. Thus, the land retained a part <br />of the orginally stated value for wildlife production and hunting. <br />