My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00631
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00631
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:00 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.900.30
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Indian Tribes
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1993
Title
Salinity Verification - Phase I Final Report for Navajo Nation Unit - San Juan county NM - Salinity Control Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br /> <br />:;:.~~?i:0 <br /> <br />(.>) <br />....' <br />o <br />..r~ <br /> <br />Some have postulated power plant cooling ponds as pne source of some underground <br /> <br />flow and saline springs as another. It was determined beyond the scope of this <br /> <br /> <br />study to trace and quantify such sources, and, in any instance, would not be <br /> <br />affected by a USDA salinity control program. The contributing watershed for this <br /> <br /> <br />area of the San Juan is expansive, covering a large area of northwestern New <br /> <br /> <br />Mexico. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />As for the increased salinity in the Colorado River caused by irrigation <br />agriculture, Table 5 displays the reductions in salt pick up that could <br />reasonably be expected by implementing a program to improve onfarm irrigation <br />efficiencies by an average of about 20 percent and reduce about two-thirds of the <br />off-farm seepage from canals and laterals by the use of pipe and concrete lining. <br /> <br />Onfarm, deep percolation has been estimated to account for nearly one-half of the <br />total return flow. Deep percolation, in percentage of water applied, ranged from <br />about 11 percent to about 95 percent on the farms evaluated. Excessive <br />{:':~~ <br />Q~~ irrigation set times on fields with relative short lengths of run are considered <br />a major factor in the production of both tailwater and deeply percolated water. <br />On some of the farms, irrigation water management could be implemented at once to <br />reduce excessive set times which would immediately reduce some of the deep <br />percolation and tailwater. Other farms will need improvement in onfarm <br />irrigation systems before irrigators will be able to manage the water <br />effectively. <br /> <br />lS <br /> <br /> <br />An onfarm program to improve about 80 percent of the furrow irrigation systems <br />would involve such land treatment and management. practices as ditch lining, gated <br />pipe and surge valves, water control structures, land leveling, and irrigation <br />water management. The onfarm program would reduce salt loading by about 26,000 <br />tons per year. Program costs for the onfarm improvements at $600 per acre on <br />6,700 acres would be about $4 million. Average annual cost for onfarm salt load <br />reduction would be about $13 per ton. ~ ~ <br />_' -~ - 600{! 700.; ::: 'f,ozG,OO:> <br /> <br />- ~ L{ Plq D"~. -/-t,~ <br />~. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.