Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJEOT <br /> <br />It is apparent that the incremental cost of generating substitute <br />energy applies to pl. lottees having generating facilities of their own <br />eapt1ble of produeing the substitute energy. <br />However, this dIstrict, having no generating faeilities, will be <br />compelled to purQhase (rather than generate) substitute energy. <br />The quantity of energy so purehased, and the time of use of sueh <br />energy, will bedjctated by the district's operating requirements. <br />Some such purehases may be "on peak" with referenee to the sources <br />of energy, and henee may be more costly than possible "off peak" <br />purehases. The cqst of substitute energy to the district presumably <br />will be greater than the contraet eost of HOOver energy. <br />It is the view of'this distriet that in interpreting and applying the <br />quoted language of; the criteri", "the inerement"l eost" to the district <br />of substitute energjy will be determined with referenee to the actual <br />eost of such energy to the distriet at the time I1nd in the quantity <br />required for distriet operations. <br />Your eonfirmatiqn (or comments) on this eonstruetion, at an early <br />date, will be appreciated. Any diffieulty relating to determination <br />of incremental eosts would be eliminated if substitute energy ean be <br />delivered in accor<;lanee with the district's operating requirements. <br />The distriet will mueh prefer sueh substitute energy instead of mone- <br />tary eompensation. Your present assurance that such substitute <br />energy e"n and will be supphod would be most helpful. <br />Very truly ~ours, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />R. A. SKINNER, <br />General Manager and Ohief Engineer. <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF WA'l'ER AND POWER <br />OF THE CITY OF Los ANGELES, <br />Los Angeles, Oalif., May 2, 1962. <br /> <br />Hon. STEwAR'r L. UDALL, <br />Secretary of the I nt~rior, <br />Department of the Il'terior, Washington, D.O. <br />Attention of Mr. F:loyd E. Dominy, Oommissioner of Reclamation. <br />DEAR SIR: We luwe your letter of April 4, 1962, transmitting a <br />proposed "Additional Regulation No.1 to the General Regulations <br />for Generation and Sale of Power in Aecordanee With the Boulder <br />Ot1nyon Projeet Adjustment Act" and requesting comments thereon. <br />We ohserve (,hat the language with respeet to reimbmsement <br />to "* * * the Upper Oolorndo River B"sin fund for moneys expended <br />from sueh fund on aeeount of allowl1nces for Hoover diminu. <br />tion * **" does npt make any provision for interest on the moneys <br />so expended from s!lid fund. <br />While we should! prefer that the language explieitly state that the <br />contemplated reimbursement is to be "'without interest," we assume <br />thl1t it is vour intebt to aehieve the same result through the omission <br />of any pro'vision fot interest and that the language does in faet aehieve <br />this result. . <br />Wlmt we have said above with respeet to the language of the <br />prollosed "AdditiOll,,1 Regulation No.1" is, of eomBe, equ"lly appli- <br />e.\ble to the languitge contained in seetion 5 of "General Prineiples <br />To Govern, and Operating Criteria for, Glen Oanyon Reservoir (Lake <br />Powell) and Lake; Mead During the Lake Powell Filling Period" <br />