My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00608
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:52 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Rates
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1989
Author
USDOE - WAPA
Title
Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects - Proposed Adjustment of Firm Power Eates
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />, <br />, <br />( <br /> <br />Status: An increase in the Congressional appropriations <br />ceiling is needed before construction can be completed. <br />Diamond Fork is included in the CRSP PRS outside the rate- <br />setting years. <br />FY 1989 Power Repayment Responsibility: $64,149,000 <br /> <br />d. Irrigation and Drainage (I&D) System. The I&D System will <br />distribute irrigation water to the arid farmlands in <br />central Utah. Almost all of the cost will be assigned to <br />irrigation for repayment, and will be paid from CRSP power <br />revenues. <br /> <br />Status: Congressional funding is uncertain. Construction <br />has not yet begun. The I&D System is included in the CRSP <br />PRS outside the rate-setting years. <br /> <br />FY 1989 Power Repayment Responsibility: $364,663,000 <br /> <br />Total FY 1989 Power Repayment Responsibility: $956,138,000 <br /> <br />E. Apportionment to the States. The CRSP Act credits each of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin states with a share of the net CRSP power <br />revenues which are available annually after all annual expenses, <br />required repayment of investment, and state-specific revenues have <br />been credited to the states. Additionally, each state receives a <br />share of all surplus M&I revenues available for participating <br />project repayment, according to the ratios in the legislation. The <br />surplus apportionment revenues are credited to the Basin Account and <br />the credit is held in reserve until it is required to repay the cost <br />of participating projects in each state. There is no actual cash <br />distribution to a state. <br /> <br />The CRSP PRS shows only the total revenue requirement to be met by <br />the CRSP. The display of funds going to the individual states is <br />handled by an off-line spreadsheet. <br /> <br />The effect of revenue required for apportionment upon the total <br />revenue requirements faced by the CRSP is dramatic, as shown in <br />Appendix W. For example, if Colorado requires $1, that dollar must <br />be 46 percent of the entire sum provided by the CRSP. To earn $1 <br />for Colorado, the CRSP must provide $2.17 in total, to assure all of <br />the states their assigned share of revenue. If $1 is required by <br />Utah, however, the CRSP must provide $4.65 in all, to guarantee each <br />state its share of revenue. <br /> <br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION <br /> <br />In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, <br />Council on Environmental Quality Regulations and section D of the DOE <br />guidelines published in the Federal Register on December 15, 1987 (52 FR <br />47662), Western will follow the process described below in conducting an <br />environmental evaluation of the proposed rate adjustment. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.