My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00596
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:50:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.200
Description
Paradox Valley Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
7/7/1986
Title
Finding of No Significant Impact For Deep-Well Injection Testing Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />pad and road already exist on the site. Reclamation would use the existing well <br />pad location and remain close to the existing road alignment. Sore noticeable <br />disturbance to the area would occur during construction and the test, but if the <br />test is successful, Reclamation would design all permanent facilities to blend <br />with the natural surroundings and minimize impacts to this section of river. <br /> <br />30. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />2. Page 24: The last paragraph fits into the Recreation/Scenery section better <br />than the Wild/Scenic Rivers. <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />The text has been changed to reflect this ccmnent. <br /> <br />3l. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />3. Page 25 - The matrix should identify positive impacts of proposed <br />construction of a raft take-out point. The statements regarding impacts to <br />scenery here do not track with those in the matrix on page 25 (Le. how low is <br />"low in profile"? How far is "away fran the river"?) These impacts are <br />difficult to assess as stated. Please clarify and quantify, if possible. <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />Construction of the raft take-out facility was a carrnitment under the Dolores <br />Project and is not related to this test facility. "LoN in Profile" is a <br />relative term. All test facilities would be constructed to keep their height as <br />low as possible while still maintaining operational efficiency. The matrix has <br />been changed to incorporate this ccmrent. Accordingly, all facilities would be <br />constructed as far away fran the river as possible. <br /> <br />32. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />Irrpacts to wild and scenic rivers are not assessed adequately in this ~. <br />"offsetting foregone values" in a potential wild river section, if possible, <br />does not negate the fact that the values are no longer present. <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />The area chosen for the injection well test was already a site for an oil well <br />and is located just downstream of an area that was placer mined. Also, an <br />unimproved dirt road exists in the area. Reclamation would use this site to <br />lessen impacts to the proposed wild and scenic river corridor. <br /> <br />33. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />l. What are long-term losses to wildlife? What species would be lost? <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />As stated in the assessment there would be a minimal permanent loss of habitat <br />for a few species of small rodents. Although the specific species lost is <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />C 0007~J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.